Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Quote by Ron Paul (For the Ron Paul Cult)

Posted on 12/06/2007 7:59:05 AM PST by april15Bendovr

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-226 next last
To: mnehrling

Precisely.
But that doesn’t stop the somnambulists and the like from saying it.


81 posted on 12/06/2007 9:49:23 AM PST by Darksheare (Cordite Chipmunk, the Splodent Rodent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: svcw
I read about a meeting in Beirut in January 2001. Iran, Iraq & all of the big name terrorist organizations sent representatives to it. It’s not known exactly what they talked about. What would be your best guess? Think Israel was the only hot topic?

I used to have an article written by Andrea Koppel about it bookmarked, but can’t find it anymore.

82 posted on 12/06/2007 9:50:32 AM PST by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare; tmp02
So attacking our troops isn’t an attack. Fascinating.

I do not think tmp02 has ever been in harms way while serving our country. If he had he would feel differently.
83 posted on 12/06/2007 9:51:37 AM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: John D; tmp02

The prospect of pain and death does alter one’s outlook in most remarkable ways.


84 posted on 12/06/2007 9:54:27 AM PST by Darksheare (Cordite Chipmunk, the Splodent Rodent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Saddam did not intend on losing his beloved renegade province. He also thought we’d leave him alone.

I do not know if anyone told you, but Saddam is dead! I think that means ... "Mission Accomplished"

85 posted on 12/06/2007 9:59:00 AM PST by Thomas Jefferson II (If we could harness the energy from our forefathers spinning in their graves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: tmp02
They would not have been shooting at us in Iraq if we did not over there.

We would not have been over there if your favorite nation had not attacked Kuwait. Iraq agreed to the terms of the cease fire and then reneged.
86 posted on 12/06/2007 9:59:03 AM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr
Does anyone know what the Ron Paul view on Valerie Plame is?

Probably akin to the Catholics' view of the Virgin Mary.

87 posted on 12/06/2007 9:59:13 AM PST by sauropod (Welcome to O'Malleyland. What's in your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Thomas Jefferson II

Nice attempt to sidestep.
1991, Saddam did NOT intend to lose Kuwait.
He seriously thought we wouldn’t do Desert Shield or Desert Storm.


88 posted on 12/06/2007 10:00:30 AM PST by Darksheare (Cordite Chipmunk, the Splodent Rodent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare; Thomas Jefferson II

There is not a single plausible reason why Saddam would have invaded Kuwait if he did not intend to keep it.


89 posted on 12/06/2007 10:01:58 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Thomas Jefferson II

And he didn’t end up dead until after Operation Iraqi Freedom.
So their whining about us not killing him ‘before’ is a little disingenuous.


90 posted on 12/06/2007 10:03:50 AM PST by Darksheare (Cordite Chipmunk, the Splodent Rodent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

Comment #91 Removed by Moderator

To: svcw
Tell me about it.
92 posted on 12/06/2007 10:05:45 AM PST by Darksheare (Cordite Chipmunk, the Splodent Rodent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
There is not a single plausible reason why Saddam would have invaded Kuwait if he did not intend to keep it.

As someone who considered himself the modern day Saladin, Kuwait was supposed to only his first step to empire, which is why we got the support of Arabs we did in pushing him back outta Kuwait.

93 posted on 12/06/2007 10:06:18 AM PST by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Thomas Jefferson II

King George the I?
That sounds exactly like the Libs.


94 posted on 12/06/2007 10:06:21 AM PST by Darksheare (Cordite Chipmunk, the Splodent Rodent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Thomas Jefferson II

Not getting the connection between WWII and Viet Nam.


95 posted on 12/06/2007 10:13:43 AM PST by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
There is not a single plausible reason why Saddam would have invaded Kuwait if he did not intend to keep it.

I'm sure the Paulvestites will find some link saying that the first Bush administration worked with Saddam to plan it to enrich the military-industral complex.

96 posted on 12/06/2007 10:13:45 AM PST by mnehring (..one candidate did not display any moderateness or liberalism...Fred Thompson - Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Good grief, is that interview for real? It reads like a piece in the Onion.

“I think if we pulled out of the Middle East, Arabs would work out a better deal with Israel.”

“We’re dealing with a few people. Of course, since we’re doing the wrong thing, there’s a lot more enemies out there now.”

“Terrorists are very weak people. They don’t have a political base. They don’t have a government. They have no military. We were attacked by people with razor blades.”

Cluelessness personified. He and Kucinich tie for the worst Commander in Chief wannabees.


97 posted on 12/06/2007 10:16:57 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

I hear the sound of thunder, the thunder of a thousand viking kitties preparing an almighty ZOT.


98 posted on 12/06/2007 10:17:16 AM PST by mnehring (..one candidate did not display any moderateness or liberalism...Fred Thompson - Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Perhaps.
Then again, I’m also on a thread where some morons are saying it’s okay for so-called ‘hunters’ to shoot without id’ing their targets.
(In other words, yahoos who shouldn’t have guns and have little to do with the tradition of hunting.)


99 posted on 12/06/2007 10:19:25 AM PST by Darksheare (Cordite Chipmunk, the Splodent Rodent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

I’ve given up on that thread.


100 posted on 12/06/2007 10:20:40 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-226 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson