I already told you my thoughts. I was clear.
Most of your hypothetical outcomes are not that realistic and I can easily see Giuliani agreeing with many of them. The abortion one is an obvious example.
The only strength is his committment to the WOT, but I gotta even question that. Would he use good judgement, influence & diplomacy, or would he let his ego get us into unneccessary wars? To protect our children in the WOT, would he support an initiative to allow pilots and school principals to carry firearms? I think not! He only fights for liberal causes and his ego.
BTW - I would vote for Fred in a heartbeat.
Pilots now are allowed to carry firearms--no thanks to liberal, gun-grabbers like Rudy.
Ref. the WOT. It's outrageous to think that Rudy is the only (or even the best) Republican to aggressively fight the WOT (Paul doesn't even count).
Exactly what would Rudy do different in the WOT than President Bush (or any other Republican)?
Push more gun control?
Sue gun manufacturers?
Expand sanctuary cities?
Encourage illegal immigration by telling illegals that they are not really illegal?
Encourage even more illegal immigration by publicly affirming continued citizenship for kids of illegals?
Allow gays to openly serve in the military?
Continue to publicly tell muslims and the world that Islam is a ‘great religion’ (like he did in the CNN debate)?
Make solid appointments to important positions like his recommendation to President Bush of Bernie Kerik to head Homeland Security?
Put emergency command centers in the most likely targets (like he did in NY)?
It's absolutely outrageous to think that we need a LIBERAL to aggressively and successfully fight the WOT.