Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jimmy Carter: U.S. farm subsidies' harvest of misery
Sacramento Bee ^ | 12/11/7 | Jimmy Carter

Posted on 12/11/2007 7:45:04 AM PST by SmithL

Congress can still act decisively this year to right a wrong that is hurting both small American farmers and the poorest people on the planet. A long-overdue debate is taking place on reform of the 1933 farm bill, passed during the Great Depression to alleviate the suffering of America's family farmers. I was a farm boy then, and the primary cash crops on my father's farm were peanuts and cotton. My first paying job was working for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, measuring farmers' fields to ensure that they limited their acreage and total production in order to qualify for the life-sustaining farm subsidy prices.

Tragically, in its current form this legislation does not fulfill its original purposes but instead encourages excess production while channeling enormous government payments to the biggest producers. This product of powerful lobbyists now punishes small-scale farmers in the United States and is devastating to families in many of the world's least affluent countries.

It is embarrassing to note that, from 1995 to 2005, the richest 10 percent of cotton growers received more than 80 percent of total subsidies. The wealthiest 1 percent of American cotton farmers continues to receive over 25 percent of payouts for cotton, while more than half of America's cotton farmers receive no subsidies at all.

American farmers are not dependent on the global market because they are guaranteed a minimum selling price by the federal government.

American producers of cotton received more than $18 billion in subsidies between 1999 and 2005, while market value of the cotton was $23 billion. That's a subsidy of 86 percent!

The Carter Center works primarily among the world's poorest people, including those in West Africa whose scant livelihood depends on cotton production....

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: farmbill; peanut
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2007 7:45:06 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

He is sounding strangely conservative.

What did he drink?


2 posted on 12/11/2007 7:51:58 AM PST by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I don’t recall Dimmy doing anything about this when he was supposed to be acting as president. Did he know there was a problem then or did he just discover it when Bush took office?


3 posted on 12/11/2007 7:52:19 AM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"I was a farm boy then"

And evolved into a 100 percent horse's ass.

STFU UP ALREADY JIMMAH!
4 posted on 12/11/2007 7:52:22 AM PST by mkjessup (Hunter-Bolton '08 !! Patriots who will settle for nothing less than *Victory* in the War on Terror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Jimmah’s first job was a bureaucrat. How sweet.


5 posted on 12/11/2007 7:52:35 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Missing from Jimmie’s liberal rant on dollar subsidies are the governmentally sanctioned subsidies for farm labor, namely, the allowance of hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens to these same farm conglomerates.

The money saved in wages, taxes collected, and benefits probably totals more than all the cash subsidies.


6 posted on 12/11/2007 7:53:02 AM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
PS - oh Jimmah? That extra 'up' is for an 'up yours' yet to be issued.

Now go gargle with razor blades.
7 posted on 12/11/2007 7:53:20 AM PST by mkjessup (Hunter-Bolton '08 !! Patriots who will settle for nothing less than *Victory* in the War on Terror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

No kidding, I read it and had to double check the Author’s name since I was agreeing with him!


8 posted on 12/11/2007 7:53:50 AM PST by DarkSavant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
He could’ve done something when he was President.

Hypocrite.

9 posted on 12/11/2007 7:54:24 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
My first paying job was working for the U.S. Department of Agriculture - Ah, got a taste for the govt payroll and just couldn't ever do anything else.
10 posted on 12/11/2007 7:56:30 AM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

—since I don’t sign in for the Bee, does Jimmah get into the peanut subsidy?


11 posted on 12/11/2007 7:56:52 AM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Sounds like he is actually saying something I agree with.
I’ve never understood farm subsidies and getting paid NOT to grow something.

Anything with the words gov’t and subsidies in it has got to be bad.


12 posted on 12/11/2007 7:56:57 AM PST by a real Sheila (stop hillary NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
He is sounding strangely conservative.
What did he drink?

He's actually making the case for the ceasing of the subsidies and moving cotton production overseas.

I bet his liberal water carriers haven't noticed this yet.

13 posted on 12/11/2007 8:01:17 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (No buy China!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DarkSavant

It should be interesting to see what happens to this issue now that it’s been picked up by one of the anointed on the left and reframed as a rich vs. poor issue. I’ve always felt that the gov’t should get it’s nose out of the farm industry and let it be sorted out on its own. The upside is it may actually get some attention. The downside is that if it becomes a liberal “problem” to solve, the only thing I can be assured of is that I’ll have less money, and a targeted voting block will receive it.


14 posted on 12/11/2007 8:04:46 AM PST by BMiles2112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

the AG subsidy is the Third Rail of politics for our nation of farmers and has a high probability of never seeing substantial reform.


15 posted on 12/11/2007 8:05:58 AM PST by Liaison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Farm subsidies are among the most wasteful excesses in the entire budget. I think we pay out like 200 billion a year aiding giant agribusiness, for no apparent reason.


16 posted on 12/11/2007 8:06:41 AM PST by ChurtleDawg (kill em all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

“He’s actually making the case for the ceasing of the subsidies and moving cotton production overseas.”

You got it!


17 posted on 12/11/2007 8:08:07 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I just hate it when I agree with Jimmy Carter. Thankfully it only happens every 30 years or so.


18 posted on 12/11/2007 8:08:37 AM PST by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liaison
the AG subsidy is the Third Rail of politics for our nation of farmers and has a high probability of never seeing substantial reform.

It seems that all things to do with big business are like that. Illegal immigration and the China mess just don't seem to get any better despite the fact that a vast majority want something done.
19 posted on 12/11/2007 8:09:28 AM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

Even a blind pig finds an occasional acorn.


20 posted on 12/11/2007 8:10:38 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson