Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times Set To Nuke Hillary? (Tomorrow?)
Riehl World View ^ | 12/15/07

Posted on 12/15/2007 8:27:52 AM PST by LdSentinal

New York Times Set To Nuke Hillary?

Drudge has this below up with no link. But pay attention to the reporter's name:

NYT Plans Sunday Exclusive on Questionable Clinton Library donors... Reporter Don Van Natta... Developing...

He's a serious award-winning investigative journalist ... and co-author with Jeff Gerth of Her Way:

link: Prosecutors later came to believe that Hillary had padded her bills; she "wasn't guilty of [knowingly] facilitating nefarious transactions -- she was guilty of doing less work than she took credit for," Jeff Gerth and Don Van Natta Jr. explain in their 2007 biography, Her Way. Hillary herself never took refuge in this explanation.

Somehow I'm thinking Hillary isn't pleased re Her Way:

Van Natta: "We also show that she has a sort of secret side to her Senate office. We call it the mysteries of Hillaryland in the book where she actually had people on, employees of hers, people on her payroll, who she did not divulge as she was supposed to, according to Senate rules, and we have ethics experts raising questions about that."

Gerth: "She is now running for president, and we felt that people needed to understand how, how she acts in the political arena and, and use that as a basis for deciding whether she is qualified to be president or not. And, you know, in essence, we sort of found that there are two Hillarys. In, in one case, there's the well-informed, the battle-tested, the diligent senator who does her homework. And then we found another Hillary. When it comes to a bump in the road -- whether it is on Iraq or on energy policy or on the environment, where she has a problem, that she plays fast and loose with the facts, she won't admit a mistake, and she sort of, you know, retreats into a shell."



TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas
KEYWORDS: clintonlibrary; foreignmoney; hillary; putsomeiceonthat; saudiarabia; traitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-263 next last
To: LdSentinal

I know a lot of people here want Clinton to win the nomination because she seems to be so beatable in the general election. I’m firmly in the other camp however, with those who want to see her gone as soon as possible.

I view it as having a dark celler infested with rats, along with a single poisonous snake. You could encourage the snake as it killed the rats one by one, and then go down to kill the snake after it had eliminated all the rats. But what happens if you trip, or make some other kind of mistake? Maybe the snake, as slow and stupid as it may be, ends up killing you after all. I say try to dispatch the snake at the very earliest opportunity, even if it leaves you with a rat problem that you have to solve later.


181 posted on 12/15/2007 10:45:42 AM PST by NewMexLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf


182 posted on 12/15/2007 10:47:29 AM PST by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Why do I feel like we are witnessing the last days of Hitler, repeated all over again??

How many sycophants are going to go down with them, and will thier be enough Democrats left when the smoke clears to rebuild a new Democratic Party from the ashes of the Clinton Legacy??


183 posted on 12/15/2007 10:50:50 AM PST by tcrlaf (You can lead a Liberal to LOGIC, but you can't make it THINK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist
I had the unpleasant experience of witnessing an Obama stump speech in South Carolina. He is so blasted charismatic and mouths the right phrases that he would be more formidable in the general election than She Who Will Not Be Named. Although he has absolutely nothing to back it up, his message is one of a vague hope for a better future, and the undecideds may well buy into that rather than vote against the witches negatives. We had best be careful with what we wish for.
184 posted on 12/15/2007 10:51:00 AM PST by buckalfa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: bigjoesaddle
If it looks like Obama is going to win, Hillary will sneak into his room and rip out his jugular with her bare teeth before she lets him win.

Can you imagine the private conversation between the Clintons if the Commodities Scam Queen goes down to Obama? "You let a f------ n----- get the best of you! All our plans and you lose to a f------ n-----! Don't you go blaming this on the f------ Jews. You had it. I gave it to you. And you just blew it."

ML/NJ

185 posted on 12/15/2007 10:52:12 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Jo Nuvark
Hillary must be dead, not MOSTLY dead.

Reminds me of the line from the Princess Bride. "Mostly dead is still partly alive". Clinton Inc is like the monster in some horror flick, no matter how many times you kill them, they always come back.

Here is what is going one. New Democrat Primary, same old drama queen media's "horse race" template.

1st they puff up a front runner, then they manufacture some hype about the front runner "faltering" campaign, then when the "faltering campaign" wins one of the early primaries they start hyper ventilating about the "comeback kid" and their amazing come from behind victory. Then after building up momentum for the "comeback kid" they start beating up the challengers for not "getting out of a race they cannot win".

186 posted on 12/15/2007 11:00:26 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Hillary Clinton has never done one thing right. She thinks that qualifies her to be President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Victor
I think Rush said that when the NYT turns on her it will essentially be over.

In the alternate universe of the NYT and its weird readers, things are never quite what they may seem. When Clinton first ran for Senator, the Slimes raked her over the coals unmercifully--then endorsed her.

187 posted on 12/15/2007 11:05:57 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland
It’s over, Obama is their guy.

I black Marxist trumps a female Marxist any day.
188 posted on 12/15/2007 11:06:43 AM PST by Beckwith (<the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Like Halle Berry when she won the Oscar as the first Black female to do so, her Mom was no where to be seen, likewise for Obama, is there a reason to be ashamed of your White parents?
His Mom is no longer around but I understand his matermal grandparents are.


189 posted on 12/15/2007 11:08:17 AM PST by pennboricua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Your “Horserace Template” is way more than MOSTLY dead on. LOL!

JO’S LITMUS FOR MEDIA TRUTH

1. If the Main Stream (Anti American ) Media (MSAAM) reports that the sun will come up tomorrow, I’m waiting for dawn before believing them. (Courtesy of FReeper CodeMasterPhilzar)

2. The next time you become outraged over a MSAAM headline, calm down. It probably isn’t true.

3. Whatever the MSAAM is backing, I’m backing away from it. A sound litmus for this age of deception and ignorance.

4. If the media promotes it, it is probably a lie and will eventually cost you either your life, your liberty or your sanity.

5. Don’t trust anyone over thirty ESPECIALLY if they are a liberal college professor or MSAAM journalist.

NOTE: This litmus may also be applied to many of the aged (and second generation), hippie left over drug stunted academic bourgoise lemming professors in our institutions of higher learning. Their mantra was “challenge the establishment”. Yet they have become the establishment and their narrow thinking is rarely challenged. Debate is healthy. Research and data from sources other than the circularly validating usual sources should be encouraged. Rather than punish, truth and observable data that contradicts their elitist agendae should be met with maturity and a willingness to “learn”.

NOT A CHRISTOPHOBE

NOT A MATRIX CONSERVATIVE


190 posted on 12/15/2007 11:10:44 AM PST by Jo Nuvark (Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Just getting the dirt out now so after she is nominated they can claim "that is old news" to excuse not covering it during the General Election.

We will know soon, but my read is that The fat lady is about to sing. This could be over very quickly.
191 posted on 12/15/2007 11:11:56 AM PST by cgbg (Nada non nyet--nanny amnesty Huckabee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hazwaste
Those that support the Clintons have already accepted the fact that they're evil and they have choosen to overlook it.

If you hung around enough liberals like I have (not recommending you do so by choice, believe me :-) ) you would see that they only supported the Slick One because he and Hillary fought the "good fight" against the "evil Republicans".

However, they now have an alternative, a black man no less.

Obama is Hillary's worst nightmare.
192 posted on 12/15/2007 11:15:53 AM PST by cgbg (Nada non nyet--nanny amnesty Huckabee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

I think they will have to put a urinal on each of the Clintons’ future graves. If they charged admission they could probably do away with the income tax for a generation (until no one remembered the Clintons any more).


193 posted on 12/15/2007 11:18:40 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: JLS
Still this does not sound like that big a deal to me. I can not imagine implication of the donor list could be anything that the public at large could easily understand. It can not be even as simple as Chinese dishwahsers donating several months pay to he campaign?

lol

Look, the Times wrote an encyclopedia on the "Plame Affair" and all the liberals got from that was that "Cheney ruthlessly exposed an enemy".

The Times writings were totally misleading if not just false, the details were extremely complicated, but the attack stuck in the minds of their readers.

The bottom line--the details of Hillary's "bad deed number 516" (after the Times helped cover up or justify the first 515 of them) won't matter. It is enough that the Times pontificates that this one is a "Big Deal". Rush is right--if they say she is toast she is toast (because the liberal readers and followers will fall in line).
194 posted on 12/15/2007 11:21:20 AM PST by cgbg (Nada non nyet--nanny amnesty Huckabee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
I have a friend who lives and breathes the New York Times. She acts like she has a secret link to every truth in the universe because she reads the NYT. I am waiting for her to tell me the bad news about hillary. he he I have known it all along!

Liberals are like the American Left was in the 1930s.

When Moscow said Hitler was bad he was bad. When Moscow changed their mind with the Hitler-Stalin pact he was good. Then when Hitler invaded Russia he was bad again.

So it shall be with the New York Times and Hitlery.

:-)


195 posted on 12/15/2007 11:24:56 AM PST by cgbg (Nada non nyet--nanny amnesty Huckabee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland
It’s over, Obama is their guy.

I'm not so sure that if Hitlery doesn't take the nomination that Edwards won't still take it. With Obama as the VEEP.

196 posted on 12/15/2007 11:25:46 AM PST by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

You have cojones... and Hillary has your address. Stay safe!!!


197 posted on 12/15/2007 11:26:41 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

I may have quite a problem if she wins. So, she cannot be allowed to win.


198 posted on 12/15/2007 11:28:17 AM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe

I agree. I think that Edwards is sitting there in the background, not making enemies, and waiting to pick up the pieces.


199 posted on 12/15/2007 11:29:52 AM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Liberals and the NYT are for the dem candidate who will frighten conservatives the most. They’ve made their choice. They believe conservatives will be more scared of a black man than a white lady.


200 posted on 12/15/2007 11:30:28 AM PST by Crawdad (I cried because I had no shoes, until I met a man who had no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-263 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson