I would. I would applaud madly. What I cannot accept is surrender in an existential struggle with Islam and renunciation of the doctrine of forward defense. His lack of judgment in defining a foreign policy makes me question his ability to make judgments across the board.
There's no requirement that libertarians be surrender monkeys. Nothing in the philosophy of libertarianism compels surrender-monkeyness. Paul chose that and he chose wrong, big time.
Howso? Ron Paul voted for the Afghanistan operations.
Funny, but you guys all have already voted for his foreign policy, See here:
W the Non-interventionist