To: Steamburg; marktwain
Second, that the State of Colorado is run by a bunch of nannies who are afraid that armed guards might actually be armed.What is being discussed in the article is a CITY ordinance for the city of Colorado Springs. There is no state law covering the topic.
126 posted on
12/16/2007 4:54:51 PM PST by
Uri’el-2012
(you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
To: XeniaSt
Sorry, I should have been more clear, I did state that the restriction was a City or County Ordinance, but I also stated that I thought that Colorado Government had become a Nanny State. Those statements should probably not have appeared together. I still believe that the State and its subdivisions are moving rapidly toward an over regulated system designed to make California Transplants feel more at home.
129 posted on
12/16/2007 5:34:18 PM PST by
Steamburg
(Your wallet speaks the only language most politicians understand.)
To: XeniaSt
What is being discussed in the article is a CITY ordinance for the city of Colorado Springs.
There is no state law covering the topic.
I'm not even aware of a local ordinance on revolvers.... but, it's possible I suppose. That's why I won't ever get "licensed" as a guard, lol. I'll be a "Security Consultant". haha
164 posted on
12/17/2007 7:21:06 AM PST by
Rick.Donaldson
(http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson