Nope. I clearly said that I cited it because YOU consider it so important.
...your guy is the ony GOP candidate to squander a 30 point lead.
Your "analysis" of the Dec 12 debate was that percentage change was important. Now that your guy has lost 96%, you want to go back to actual losses. Fine.
I'll point out again that Hunter Duncan never had a "30-point lead" to lose. He never had even had a 3-point lead, or any lead at all.
He's just raising a war chest for his son's congressional run. His whole vanity campaign seems to be a fundraising farce.
Good luck with that.
Nope. I clearly said that I cited it because YOU consider it so important.
***So you spend time on a thread for a candidate that you think has no chance, as you’ve done in the past, quoting data that you don’t consider important. Now THAT’s trolling.
Your “analysis” of the Dec 12 debate was that percentage change was important. Now that your guy has lost 96%, you want to go back to actual losses. Fine. I’ll point out again that Hunter Duncan never had a “30-point lead” to lose. He never had even had a 3-point lead, or any lead at all.
***OK, good enough point. But why bother? You spend so much effort on these pro-hunter threads trying to knock the guy down that it leads me to think you’re more afraid than you let on. So, your guy squanders 30 points on Intrade, and there’s no real comparison because my guy never had a 30 point lead. Good enough. It’s time to give Hunter that level of support, because he won’t squander it, he’s got the fire in the belly that your candidate lacks, and he’s idealogically more in line with the GOP platform. Of course, he’s an evangelical and we know that you have disdain for such evangelicals as Dobson, so much so that you call him a jackass. So if you want to talk about percentages vs. percentages, Hunter’s delta is already something that is in the past when it comes to the analysis that spits him out as the winner of the debate. Glad to see you accept that data. And now that his numbers are going down at a higher percentage compared to base value than thompson is something I agree is not a good thing for my candidate. If he goes back up,I’ll be revisiting this discussion with you. That could happen tomorrow. Best of luck with your candidate regaining 30 points. I know that won’t happen tomorrow.
He’s just raising a war chest for his son’s congressional run. His whole vanity campaign seems to be a fundraising farce. Good luck with that.
***If that’s true, you’re basically calling him a liar. You might want to produce evidence for that contention. On the basis of previous correspondence with you, that won’t happen.
.
.
.
According to Intrade, the winner of the December 12th GOP debate was... Duncan Hunter.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1938773/posts