Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: denydenydeny

Nope, the film isn’t like that at all. It’s quite even handed, and damn good.


9 posted on 12/21/2007 7:46:16 PM PST by discostu (a mountain is something you don't want to %^&* with)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

I have heard from a couple of people that the film is like you (and ReconDad) say: short on liberal revisionism and as close to “true story” as Hollywood is capable of.

From the previews I figured it would be a hatchet job on the Reagan administration and beatification of all things Dem. Now looking forward to seeing it, and the History channel show too.


12 posted on 12/21/2007 7:55:42 PM PST by fnord (If gun owners, pot smokers, and poker players start a political party, they'd never lose an election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: discostu

Agreed. I took my wife to see it today. Really, really liked it. Great acting by Hanks and Hoffman. Julia Roberts role could have been played by a dozen other women though.

But if they hadn’t cut out some wackjob part about our work in Afghanistan causing 9/11, it would have ruined the movie for me entirely.

Otherwise, it’s just great to see hollywood write a great script and perform a movie which is pro-American for once. And there was a pretty big turnout at the theatre we went to at 1pm in the afternoon.


21 posted on 12/21/2007 8:39:23 PM PST by bpjam (Harry Reid doesn't even have 32% of my approval)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson