The original source is me and photoshop.
Posted on 12/22/2007 7:04:49 AM PST by Leisler
The original source is me and photoshop.
This reminds me of Bob Dornan being challenged by Jesse Jackson on whether Dornan actually went to a King march until a photo was found of the 3 of them together.
Interesting. I thought that bat attacking the back of her head was photoshopped as well. I guess that part actually happened.
Thanks!
LOL...this thread is too funny.
At issue are the eyewitness accounts of the June 29th NAACP march; two corroborating eyewitnesses. It’s possible both are wrong, but ordinarily that’s considered strong evidence. The 1978 interview has very weak support-only one second-hand source, 30 years after the event. Your gotcha is a few links short of a chain.
What a novel idea!
My take is that there are two key issues-- the war on terror and border security.
Duncan Hunter is great on both.
Fred is good on the war on terror and so-so on border security.
Mitt is about the same as Fred or possibly a bit behind in that my perception is that he wouldn't rank high on border security, but would probably do the right thing because it is popular.
Rudy and McCain are good on the war on terror but totally untrustworthy on border security.
Huckabee is as bad or worse than Rudy and McCain on border security and probably not as good in the war on terror.
People should be doing this analysis on every major issue and weighing them accordingly.
What tipped you off the you are there part. ;)
You meant this kind
LOL
Let me save you some time.
I am nasty and small minded.
What is wrong with it? It is fake but accurate. ;)
Shall I post one of Lenore with looterman?
and 148 is also photoshopped?
Hilarious, pepperhead. Did you realize this might make you famous.....you were there...ROTFLMAO
The source for 148 is .” the Instructional Media Center Collection At Michigan State University Archives And Historical Collections: “Dr. Martin Luther King speaking to graduate student Laura L. Leichliter (center) and Michigan’s First Lady Mrs. Lenore Romney in February 1965.
I think the original newspaper reports is stronger evidence.
Although I will say that I found your defense of #107 damn funny.
Well, for one thing, I'm a graphic designer and that is as horribly obvious a "Photoshop" (which I use daily) as the phony smoke over Lebanon.
Even the most casual of photographers can recognize the difference in light on the subjects. See how it's the same on the Romneys, but different on MLK? Also, look at MLK's jacket, between the mics. Doesn't it look a bit "unnatural"? Yes, it does. It's because the picture fraudulent.
So, my experience in my profession is my source. You can call it "prejudice" all you want. I call it "reality".
I call your candidate names and belittle him because the names are accurate and he has been falsely built up into something he is not.
In response, supporters of your candidate routinely post personal insults directed toward me and anyone else like me who sees Willard for what he is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.