Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freekitty
Dr. Paul better go back and read his history. The civil war was not about slavery. It was about economics.

It was about both and they were directly tied together. The North imposed what we would call today as sanctions against the Southern States because they wouldn't abolish slavery. The Southern states said it was their state right to decide that issue and succeeded, thus, the North went to war to preserve the Union. The reasons were complicated, and yes, did involve economics and State's rights, but slavery was the catalyst.

181 posted on 12/24/2007 2:36:56 PM PST by mnehring (Ron Paul- Politically the bastard love child of David Duke and Cindy Sheehan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: mnehrling

It was the distraction so the North could destroy the South which had become richer and more powerful.


183 posted on 12/24/2007 2:43:11 PM PST by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling
"The North imposed what we would call today as sanctions against the Southern States"

Well the tariff was certainly objectionable to the South had was the primary reason South Carolina seceded; but I have never heard the tariff described as "sanctions". The purpose of the tariff was to protect northern industries, not to sanction the South - though the effect of the tariff certainly did hurt the South. The Yankees were pretty much indifferent to the effect the tariff had on the South.

186 posted on 12/24/2007 2:47:27 PM PST by antinomian (Show me a robber baron and I'll show you a pocket full of senators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson