To: antinomian; 3niner
Lincoln started the war when he invaded another country. ROTFLMAO! And the rebel attack on the garrison in Sumter had nothing to do with it I suppose?
197 posted on
12/24/2007 3:32:09 PM PST by
Non-Sequitur
(Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
To: Non-Sequitur
"ROTFLMAO! And the rebel attack on the garrison in Sumter had nothing to do with it I suppose?"
In hindsight that was certainly a mistake. But it was legal.
201 posted on
12/24/2007 3:44:09 PM PST by
antinomian
(Show me a robber baron and I'll show you a pocket full of senators.)
To: Non-Sequitur
And the rebel attack on the garrison in Sumter had nothing to do with it I suppose? You are assuming (via your use of the term "rebel") that State secession was unconstitutional. Care to prove that point? Please quote for us the specific clause of the United States Constitution that prohibits State secession. Until you prove secession was unconstitutional, the "attack on the garrison in Sumter" will more properly be considered the eviction of foreign military forces from the territory of the sovereign State of South Carolina.
;>)
213 posted on
12/24/2007 4:47:24 PM PST by
Who is John Galt?
( "He therefore who may resist, must be allowed to strike." - John Locke, 1690)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson