[AZObserver]

Agree. Let’s face it, relatively speaking McCain is preferable to Romney, Huck or Giuliani. Oh yeah — and McCain would beat Hillary nearly hands down; he’d put the Upper Midwest (particularly MI) in play and hold all the typical GOP states elsewhere.

I’d love to see Hill try to smear a certified war hero. The backlash would be considerable.

[Checkers]

“Let’s face it, relatively speaking McCain is preferable to Romney, Huck or Giuliani.”

Howdya figure?

[Sola Veritas]

“Agree. Let’s face it, relatively speaking McCain is preferable to Romney, Huck or Giuliani.”

You should be aware though that McCain will probably pick someone like Huckabee as his running mate to shore up the values base. Notice how John and Mike as saying nice things about each other; it has to be more than having a common enemy in Romney.

[Checkers]

“I’d love to see Hill try to smear a certified war hero.”

Dole lost in 96.

Bush in 92.

[Inyokern]

Let’s face it, relatively speaking McCain is preferable to Romney, Huck or Giuliani.

In my opinion, Giuliani is more likely to hold the line on taxes and to appoint conservative judges and less likely to support amnesty than McCain. McCain repeatedly calls himself "bi-partisan." I cringe when he says that.

[B Knotts]

Let’s face it, relatively speaking McCain is preferable to Romney, Huck or Giuliani.

He's worse than two of the three (Giuliani is the worst of all candidates).

Not only is McCain pro-amnesty, he is anti-free speech, anti-gun and anti-tax cuts.

[org.whodat]

It will be a long cold day in hell when I vote for that worn out OLD man.

[WOSG]

Let’s face it, relatively speaking Romney is preferable to McCain, Huck or Giuliani. By far.