[CometBaby]

I've been saying all along that Hillary would not do well in this sort of uncontrolled debate forum. She doesn't' think well on her feet.

Hillary is used to a media that has been presented with a list of questions that they will be allowed to ask her. OR, a room full of *planted* questioners. This has worked very well for her in the past .. but it won't work in this sort of forum.

She is used to getting softball questions and as a result, she has never learned to answer tough questions. The first thing she does is get angry. She is not used to people challenging her .. how dare they?? The next thing she does is throw a tantrum and start whining about it .. i.e. they are picking on me because I am a woman.

Look at how poorly she did when Russert didn't play by her rules. And remember how angry she was after? The press clearly understands that Hillary doesn't just get mad .. she gets even. If she is elected she will completely shut them out of the WH.. she may try to get them fired .. and she might even sic the IRS on them.

Hillary loves to cite her *experience* but she really doesn't have any experience at answering questions that are shot from the hip. She ought to try the rude and obnoxious questions that Republicans are CONSTANTLY asked!

And as for her experience .. she tries to present herself as a co-president who was in on all the big decisions. She never sat in on any of the security meetings. She was married to a president, who publicly humiliated her, and treated her so badly, they were hardly ever on speaking terms. I would say that hardly qualifies as a co-presidency.

[Beatthedrum]

Of course no-one in the MSM has the guts to challenge the PIAPS.. Last night they put Edwards on the spot and quite simply could have crippled the PIAPS’s career if they had asked her for specific examples of the change she’s made in the last 35 years... Once she started taking credit for things that happened in the Rapist’s 8 years (she claimed credit for the SCHIPS program last night) they could simply ask - that was something the congress wrote and passed, you were not elected, you were not in congress, please explain how you can now take credit for that program ??

No-one has the balls to challenge this sociopath, but every time she talks about 35 years of action and change, she leaves herself open - because she’s done very little in 35 years, but stand in her hubby’s spotlight and act like a big shot.

And last night when she mentioned healthcare and education in AR, the other cowards sat there and said nothing. In both instances she was a total failure. Her assignment to review national health care in her hubby’s 1st term, was also a total failure, with credible questions about her back room dealings. They could have brought that up, but they are afraid of this women’s power base in the DNC.

Maybe the weasel Edwards will go more negative and challenge her false claims of achievement, but I wouldn’t hold my breath. If he ran an ad outlining her lack of achievement and her failures, that could really cripple the bitch. I doubt he’ll do it.