LIVE THREAD - New Hampshire Primary

Self | Self | Self

[NYC Republican]

Game's ON... My prediction... Obama in a blowout, McCain by 5.

[B Knotts]

So far, the exit polls look pretty worthless.

[txhurl]

Hurl?

More like EXPATRIATE!

[seekthetruth]

“Fred has no money and not enough time to turn things around.”

This race has just begun. I am looking forward to a Fred Thompson win in South Carolina. GO FRED!

[rockabyebaby]

It worries me that people are voting for ALL THE WRONG REASONS,,,,,,

[popdonnelly]

“Hillary is gonna win this it looks like.”

God must be punishing America for past transgressions.

[Petronski]

Nice spin.

[Hattie]

John McCain - Leadership for America.

Is that supposed to be a joke?

[Dengar01]

I think we were all duped by the media with their hype of an Obama blowout. How sick is this?

The media controls the elections!

[sand88]

I guess it would be a nobrainer. I would go with Huck’s socialist hell rather than Hill’s any day.

Hell is Hell. I would rather history record it was a Democrat that finally pushed us there.

[Cedric]

I didn’t say “alone”, I said “lonely”.

{OMG that’s frighteningly Clintonesque!!}

[11th_VA]

“Hillary is gonna win this it looks like.”

The SURGE is working !!!!

[AuH2ORepublican]

“If so many liberals flee MA for NH, and NH become so liberal, why does not MA become more conservative? Instead, it too remains fully liberal.”

---

President Bush improved from 2000 to 2004 in the New Hampshire counties across the Massachusetts border, but did worse in counties across the Vermont border and in college towns. Most of the Massachusetts exiles that move to NH are actually escaping high taxes and lean Republican. However, it may be that they are socially liberal and would vote for the Democrat Shaheen against Senator Sununu, and would thus serve to make both states more liberal (like the old joke about 50,000 Georgians moving into Florida and reducing the collective IQ of both states by 5 points.)

[darkmatter]

Very scary!

I hate them both too, but you should rethink that one. McCrazy may be a liberal media primadonna and a bit of a psycho but I’ll him over a pro-life socialist any day of the week.

I may not vote for either of them, but I cant vote for Huckafraud over McCrazy, if I vote at all.

[TBBT]

Let’s see... Now if the Huckabeast comes in 4th... Will that make the MSM start wondering about his viability/credibility? Could that kind of talk snowball...?

[ErnBatavia]

I’d vote for McCain, but listlessly. Huckabee...I might have to stay home.

Reverse the two names, and you've described me. I would never pull the lever for McCain/Feingold/Keating...not ever, even if Hillary Rodman Clinton were the opposition. I'd hate my own ass forever if I did that.

[xtinct]

Hillary would be a much, much easier fight.

And, now that she's made so many politically incorrect statements in the last couple of days... :o)

[cookcounty]

"Fred has six million dollars. As of now, it's McCain who's broke."

I just sent him $100.

[COgamer]

“the question is whose socialist hell would we want to be in, or hate the least. Hillarys? Hucks? I guess it would be a nobrainer. I would go with Huck’s socialist hell rather than Hill’s any day.”

You’ve got that right. And at least Huck is right on important issues where Giuliani is as bad as Clinton: Pro-life, pro-guns, keeping marriage safe.

[SharpTalons]

Romney is a mormon. Doesn’t smoke, drink, commit adultery or swear. That really doesn’t fit the radical liberal mold. Yes, he flip flops but he’s no radical.

[hole_n_one]

We WANT CLINTON to be the nominee. She will be MUCH, MUCH easier to beat.

I agree.

Too many people will vote for Obama because they think it's the cool thing to do or beacause they like him.....not for his policy positions but simply because he's likable.

The beast is not at all likable and is certainly not cool.