Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grass Makes Better Ethanol than Corn Does (interesting if true)
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN ^ | 1/11/2008 | David Biello

Posted on 01/11/2008 8:07:03 AM PST by tobyhill

Farmers in Nebraska and the Dakotas brought the U.S. closer to becoming a biofuel economy, planting huge tracts of land for the first time with switchgrass—a native North American perennial grass (Panicum virgatum) that often grows on the borders of cropland naturally—and proving that it can deliver more than five times more energy than it takes to grow it.

Working with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the farmers tracked the seed used to establish the plant, fertilizer used to boost its growth, fuel used to farm it, overall rainfall and the amount of grass ultimately harvested for five years on fields ranging from seven to 23 acres in size (three to nine hectares).

Once established, the fields yielded from 5.2 to 11.1 metric tons of grass bales per hectare, depending on rainfall, says USDA plant scientist Ken Vogel. "It fluctuates with the timing of the precipitation,'' he says. "Switchgrass needs most of its moisture in spring and midsummer. If you get fall rains, it's not going to do that year's crops much good."

But yields from a grass that only needs to be planted once would deliver an average of 13.1 megajoules of energy as ethanol for every megajoule of petroleum consumed—in the form of nitrogen fertilizers or diesel for tractors—growing them. "It's a prediction because right now there are no biorefineries built that handle cellulosic material" like that which switchgrass provides, Vogel notes. "We're pretty confident the ethanol yield is pretty close." This means that switchgrass ethanol delivers 540 percent of the energy used to produce it, compared with just roughly 25 percent more energy returned by corn-based ethanol according to the most optimistic studies.

(Excerpt) Read more at sciam.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agw; energy; ethanol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: SmallGovBest

“Carried too far, this would conewrn me:”

At least it wouldn’t stune your beeber.


41 posted on 01/11/2008 9:12:51 AM PST by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Whether you use grass or corn, it causes more CO2 to be released into the atmosphere to manufacture ethanol than to just use gasoline. Not that CO2 released into the atmosphere makes any difference to anything.


42 posted on 01/11/2008 9:18:16 AM PST by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYCynic

Spent Liquor gasification. Uses a byproduct of paper making to make bio fuels.

Do a search on it.


43 posted on 01/11/2008 9:21:39 AM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

DUH, I guess this is result of millions of dollars of government funded research.


44 posted on 01/11/2008 9:25:45 AM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

www.gasification.org/Docs/2006_Papers/27LAND.pdf

There is a plant that is about to be (started on) constructed at NewPage paper corp in Escanaba Mi.

They are in the initial stages of planning at this time.


45 posted on 01/11/2008 9:26:16 AM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z3n
Now, if I could just get some plans for a fermentation-refinery that fits in my garage

Google moonshiners still, Same thing! http://homedistiller.org/photos-moonshine.htm

46 posted on 01/11/2008 9:29:27 AM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Just more expensive because of the meddeling of the government in price supports and land & water use restrictions. Sugar Cane produces more potential Kcals per acre than grass or corn, but artificial economic factors make it more expensive.


47 posted on 01/11/2008 3:37:57 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mogollon

...but growing the corn or switchgrass removes the CO2 from the atmosphere.


48 posted on 01/11/2008 4:19:17 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
I have worked with plasma systems for the last 15 years and I am very skeptical about plasma waste disposal and recycling systems.

Has anyone ever brought a commercially viable product to market?

A common large power supply used in plasma cutting and plasma spray systems can require up to 140Kw of input power to sustain a 6" stream of plasma.

49 posted on 01/11/2008 5:37:59 PM PST by SC Swamp Fox (Join our Folding@Home team (Team# 36120) keyword: folding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Has anyone ever brought a commercially viable product to market?

I found my own answer, it appears there are lots of waste reprocessing systems around, but I can't see how you could get one to produce more energy then it consumes creating and sustaining the plasma.

http://www.solenagroup.com/html/images/plasma.pdf

50 posted on 01/11/2008 5:50:12 PM PST by SC Swamp Fox (Join our Folding@Home team (Team# 36120) keyword: folding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
[additional reading] I stand fully corrected. Depending on the feedstock, some of these systems are producing more energy then the plasma chamber requires.

I believe there are probably better ways to create biofuels, but after 10 minutes of reading I'm wondering why most large cities aren't building one of these plants to dispose of their municipal waste and generate some electricity.

51 posted on 01/11/2008 6:08:07 PM PST by SC Swamp Fox (Join our Folding@Home team (Team# 36120) keyword: folding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
I feel like Jed Clampett....sitting on a gold mine of grass that I'll sell to the highest bidder.

U.S. Army Retired


52 posted on 01/11/2008 6:09:28 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (REAGAN: "..party..must represent certain fundamental beliefs [not] compromised..[for] expediency")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson