Posted on 01/14/2008 9:11:02 AM PST by processing please hold
One would hope that those who are not going to vote for Barak Obama aren’t going to vote for him merely because he may or may not have been a Muslim. And I expect that those who are going to vote for Obama are going to vote for him even if he had been a Muslim. Since the Constitution says there is no religious test for office holders then that’s the way it should be.
bttt
all that’s missing is the bow tie
Laura Ingraham let is slip today that she got an email from BHO campaign, she has been giggling like a school girl about him for weeks.
And Rush of all people, is constantly talking about him nicely, constantly talking about Hillary, as if the Republicans have no decisions to make?
Maybe Republican’s obsession with the Clintons has gone on too long?
Ya think?
Thank you for the bumps to it.
BTTT
Who cares what he did in third grade? Could you imagine the mockery they’d get if they attacked Thompson because he once ate his boogies and made choo-choos in his pants?
You would think so.
Let’s not vote stupid.
Giggle
If people who vote for him without putting his childhood islamic teachings into the mix when considering him, then as Jeff Head said,.... “then we deserve what we get as a people as a whoile.”
What an idiotic comment.
What I would like to see investigated is that church he belongs to. What are those folks all about?????
I agree with you there. Irrespective of what Mr. Hussein Barack calls himself, that 'church' (tucc.org) is an abomination if they claim to be preaching Christ. They write that they are 'unashamedly Christian', yet their website just includes a focus on Africa, and white=bad/black=good, diatribes.
Christ Jesus came into the World to save sinners (of whom I am chief).
Preach that, not race politics.
Even a couple on this thread.
Only until they have sufficient numbers and enough politicians elected to do their bidding.
Also.......
Not all of us.
We are at war with radical Islam. IMHO, radical islam is much more an ideology and political system than it is a religion. Even if it is both, the fact that it is also an ideology and political system means it MUST be considered when voting. Obama has ties to Islam...it should be a concern for us particularly at this point in history.
During World War II, having ever been, or born into a family that was a devoted, religiously dedicated Imperial Japanese, who considered their Emperor their God, or into a Nazi one would have certainly diqualified one for consideration...if not legally, than clearly practically and with common sense.
At this point in or history, I believe the same holds. But, with all of the other reasons to discount Obama, ie. he is an unbelievably left-leaning, socio-marxist, it is just anther in the mix...but one that is worth consideration and thought IMHO.
Thanks for posting that picture. Every time I see it I’m reminded of exactly who he is. It’s very disturbing.
I tell ya, I would never vote for him, purely for his politics. Unfortunately, there isn’t anyone on the other side that I can get too excited about. McCain—good on national security but that’s about it. Romney—pretty good on economic issues but that’s about it. Giuliani—good on security, but a little too authoritarian, would overstep his bounds—still always the DA in my book. Thompson—good, but kinda lazy. Paul-—like a lot of his stuff (except security where he’s kinda crazy. Huckaboo— puhleeze go back to Arkansas (but I do give him points for his glibness. MYSELF-—oh, I ain’t running for sh*t. forgot
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.