Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RinaseaofDs

Yours is a much better explanation that the one that suggests he is a sleeper cell.

Still, do you really think that disruptive Islamists are going to put on their investigative hats and determine the truth of these allegations before stating their position. These people accuse Jews of controlling the world with “tiny robots.” If they want a reason to oppose a U.S.-led policy initiative, they will portray a President Obama as an apostate (probably suggesting that the Jews purged damaging records that prove this). And, they’ll do this regardless of how much the Clinton campaign bird-dogs this issue. Do we really want to let their lying nature limit our field of candidates? I, for one, would like the Democrats to choose a candidate that will lose to a Republican, and in some face-offs, that may mean Obama instead of Clinton.


178 posted on 01/14/2008 12:38:51 PM PST by drb9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: drb9

You won’t catch me disagreeing with you on picking a losing D candidate.

Arguing it from their point of view, however, it would be tough trying to ‘talk it out’ with muzzies, when your guy ought to be executed under their 7th century laws.

Who’s in a better position to run the issue to ground than their ‘church’? If they substantiate it, and come to believe it, then how would the MSM portray that? Aside from their heads exploding from all the opposing venues of logic and illogic, you’d have to count on the MSM taking the low road and backing the Muzzies against President Hussein Obama.


183 posted on 01/14/2008 12:45:54 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson