You are correct.
Look at Manchester Ward 9.
We (a Republican candidate) had a poll watcher at Manchester Ward 9. He saw a van arrive every 7 minutes dropping off a new load of mostly young girls. He overheard them talking among themselves about voting for Hillary. They had no purses, or backpacks or anything along those lines. They got on the “new voter” line, showed no ID whatsoever, filled out the affidavit they were asked to fill out, and voted.
If someone wanted to find voter fraud, they’d simply have to get the new voter affidavits from Manchester Ward 9 and try to match the names and addresses from the affidavits with live bodies on the ground.
Interesting observation, truthfreedom. I looked at the results by city/town. Clearly there was a focus on the balloting at the larger cities. Manchester, Nashua, Salem, and Rochester contributed 7471 more votes to Hillary than Obama, which is essentially the margin of victory (7667 votes). Makes you wonder if those buses made roving stops around NH.
Perhaps you should send a note to the Kucinich campaign.
Today, Obama was the defrauded one, next time it will be the Republicans. A snake is a snake.
If there was hanky-panky, that's probably the answer. Hillary's surprise margin would come from the cities because that's where someone minded to cheat would bus in the ringers.
Biometric identification is coming. We'll use it first for office and banking security. It will filter out to the ATM's. Eventually we'll be "signing" our credit card purchases with a thumbprint. Then we'll use it for voting. The democrats will argue that this would unconstitutionally burden the poor and minorities who disproportionately don't have thumbs, but we'll just have to win that case when we come to it.