[cripplecreek]

I think people have never seen politics in action before. People we like endorse people we don’t like all the time. No I’m not hurt by it, nor am I likely to vote for any of the pigmy RINOs still running.

[roamer_1]

No I’m not hurt by it, nor am I likely to vote for any of the pigmy RINOs still running.

Me too. However, I would say that Huck is the only one of the remaining candidates that has always been solid on Pro-life and 2A. I do not see how there is so much support for Romney, without these two critical aspects. A gun-grabbing baby killer is not going to get elected, no matter how hard they push. Immigration? Ptah! They are all the same on that... So I can see why Hunter went the way he did.

[The Pack Knight]

Wow, I've been going through this thread, and yours is the first really sane post I've seen so far.

It seems like some people have difficulty disagreeing with someone's decision without vilifying him. If you trusted Duncan Hunter to be leader of the Free World, you should trust him to decide who he wants to endorse and respect his decision for what it is.

Duncan Hunter is a human being and a politician, not some abstract, Platonic ideal of what a conservative is. That means he won't always do things his supporters agree with. His supporters ought not take it personally.