Replies

You’re correct and I didn’t say Paul’s foreign policy is realistic by any means. His view of our State Dept’s idiocy toward tossing our money around the globe SHOULD be taken seriously, however.

Aside from his foreign policy, his views and stances are superior to anyone left in the race.

Tom McClintock knows it too. McClintock would be a far better candidate than the bag of marbles we’re attempting to choose from at the moment (and that’s not saying much).

I made some comments about Bush being the last true social conservative to be elected to office for the foreseeable future way back before 2006. I also warned about the party. The fact that it was going to fall apart as far back as I can recall. Sometime in 2003 I think.

Things change, and trends cannot be denied. The 100%'ers are going to be perpetually unhappy. They can be no other way.

Politics is a consensus sport. There are dozens if not hundreds of issues, and frankly, even I cannot remember anytime in the past when my pick during the primaries made it to the general. Not once, not even with Bush. (only the second terms of Nixon, Bush I and II.)

Bags of marbles they may be, but that is how we do it, and have always done it.