Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ANN COULTER Will Campaign For Hillary Clinton
Hannity and Colmes ^ | January 31, 2008 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 01/31/2008 9:29:37 PM PST by Yosemitest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700701-714 last
To: OPS4

A Free Press
For A Free People

Founded 1997 Saturday, February 2, 2008 Today’s Edition

FREE News Flashes

WND Directory
Shop.WND
Page 1 News
Page 2 News
Commentary
G2 Bulletin
Daily Poll
WND Forums
Letters to the Editor
BizNetDaily
Careers
SportsNetDaily
TV Guide
Weather

WND Resources
About WND
WND SCOOPS
WND BOOKS
ADVERTISE with WND
Put WND headlines on your site
Make WND your Home Page
Sign up for WND Email Alerts
VOLUNTARY PAYMENT
Download to your PDA
US Newspapers
Foreign Newspapers
Major News Wires
Other News Services
Other Sites
Writer Archives
Contact Government Officials
Search Engines
Media
Entertainment

WND People
Contact WND
Who’s Who at WND
Speakers & Talk Show Guests
Columnists





RODHAM WATCH
Is the other Hsu about to drop?
Hillary’s donor linked to China missile trader


Posted: September 2, 2007
10:36 p.m. Eastern

© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

Hillary Clinton and Norman Hsu

A shady Chinese megadonor to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign has close ties to an aerospace mogul accused of placing his business interests before national security by sharing missile secrets with Beijing during the Clinton administration.

Before his forced resignation last week, Norman Yuan Yuen Hsu sat on the board of trustees of the liberal New School university in New York with former Loral Corp. head Bernard L. Schwartz, who was allowed to transfer restricted satellite and missile technology to a People’s Liberation Army front after contributing a record amount of cash to President Clinton’s 1996 campaign.

The New School has removed Hsu’s name from its list of trustees. But the old list showing both Hsu and Schwartz is still captured on Google’s cache files. Here is the screen shot.

Schwartz, vice chairman of the New School board, was among officials who introduced Hsu to the school’s administration, WND has learned.

Hillary Clinton and Bernard Schwartz

Last November, Schwartz and Hsu chaired a New School banquet at the Mandarin Oriental in New York which featured Sen. Clinton as keynote speaker. Clinton steered a $1 million federal grant to the college.

More recently, Schwartz and Hsu (pronounced shoo) appeared together at the New York Yacht Club for Democratic Rep. Patrick Kennedy’s 40th birthday bash.

The pair are so-called HillRaisers – major donors to Clinton’s war chest – with Hsu raising more than $1 million for her campaign. Hsu, like Schwartz, has lobbied the U.S. government to relax trade rules with China.

Bill Clinton and his top donor Bernard Schwartz

Before he was a Friend of Hill, Schwartz was a Friend of Bill. In fact, then-President Clinton feted Schwartz on his 71st birthday at a White House dinner.

Sources say Schwartz vouched for Hsu at New School, even though he was a fugitive convicted of grand theft in California.

New School President Bob Kerrey assumed Hsu, now in jail, was reputable. The former Democrat senator says he didn’t question Hsu’s credentials because he liked him. He also was taken by “his personal story, coming from China, and he had an interest in fashion as well.”

“It all intrigued me,” Kerrey said.

Of course, Hsu also gave generous sums of cash to Democrats and their causes, including The New School.

Kerrey assumed Hsu, a self-described apparel magnate, made his money in the garment industry. But even that claim is now in question.

It turns out that the various companies Hsu listed on federal campaign filings with the FEC no longer exist, and may always have been fictitious. Last decade Hsu declared bankruptcy.

The FBI has opened a criminal investigation into Hsu’s fund-raising activities.

(Story continues below)

Republicans in Congress, meanwhile, see parallels to last decade’s Chinagate fund-raising scandal, and are clamoring for public hearings to get to the bottom of what may be a new chapter in an old tale of corruption, foreign influence-peddling and espionage. All told, 22 Democrat donors were convicted in the Chinagate probe, which the Justice Department officially closed a few years ago.

After he was convicted of fraud last decade, and allegedly kidnapped by a Chinese gang in San Francisco, Hsu fled to Hong Kong, where he was born and raised. He returned to the U.S. not long after Hillary Clinton won her Senate seat. Then – for the first time – he started donating heavily to Democrats. He gave no political campaign gifts in the U.S. before 2004.

“The source of Hsu’s income at this point is unknown,” a congressional investigator told WND. “It begs the question, where did he get the resources to contribute so much money?”

During the last Clinton campaign of 1996, the People’s Liberation Army launched a massive campaign to buy influence in the Democratic Party and steer military hardware and technology Beijing’s way.

Reports by federal investigators say the PLA used a host of Chinese agents living in the U.S. as bagmen to funnel cash to the Clinton-Gore campaigns and gain access to the White House and sensitive government agencies.

Even U.S. corporate executives did their bidding. Most alarmingly, Schwartz persuaded the Clinton administration to give his Loral Space and Communications subsidiary a waiver to use inexpensive Chinese rockets to launch U.S. satellites into space.

Loral at the same time helped Beijing – over the objections of the U.S. intelligence community – improve its commercial space launchers. That in turn, helped make its nuclear-tipped missiles more reliable as ICBMs, several of which are aimed at U.S. cities.

In fact, it’s believed China’s recent downing of a satellite with a ground-based missile would not have been possible without Loral’s technical assistance.

Schwartz, who was Clinton’s top donor in the 1996 election cycle, insists his contributions did not buy policy changes regarding China. He says the favorable treatment he got from the administration was merely a “coincidence.”

However, two months before he won a prized seat on a Commerce Department trade junket to China, he wrote a check to Democrats for $100,000. On the trip, Schwartz scored a meeting with China’s top telecommunications official, which led to Loral winning a deal to provide cell phone service to China – a deal worth an estimated $250 million a year.

During the 1996 election cycle, moreover, Schwartz created his Loral Satellite and Communications subsidiary. He needed export controls loosened so the start-up unit could launch its satellites on cheap Chinese booster rockets, which are nearly identical to Beijing’s strategic missiles that would greatly benefit from such dual-use U.S. technology transfers.

Schwartz lobbied the Clinton administration to transfer satellite export licenses to the more lenient Commerce Department. At the same time, he pumped $632,000 into Clinton-Gore and Democratic National Committee coffers.

That same year, in a major policy shift, President Clinton overturned an earlier 1995 decision by Secretary of State Warren Christopher and transferred authority for satellite export licenses to the Commerce Department, where Beijing managed to plant an agent by the name of John Huang. Loral got its waiver – over the objections of the Justice Department – and Schwartz kept on giving to the Clinton machine, in the end contributing well over $1 million.

Schwartz not only met with top officials at China Aerospace International Holding Ltd. – a PLA front – but he even formed a joint venture with the communist front company.

A key contact at China Aerospace was Liu Chaoying, a lieutenant colonel in the PLA.

In 1998, in the course of plea bargaining with the Justice Department, a Chinese bagman by the name of Johnny Chung confessed that at least $100,000 of his contributions to the DNC and the Clinton-Gore campaign had come from a Chinese aerospace executive – a lieutenant colonel in the Chinese military – who had given him $300,000. It was the same Chaoying involved with Loral, who happened to also be the daughter of the PLA’s top general and a key member of China’s Communist Party leadership.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57450


701 posted on 02/02/2008 4:08:15 PM PST by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

Finally, we agree on something.


702 posted on 02/02/2008 4:08:41 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
Have you lost your debating points?

Lost or not, they are my own.

I need not have some egomaniac on the radio provide them for me.

703 posted on 02/02/2008 4:09:42 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
It's time for you to have a drink, or visit your wife.
Too much stress isn't healthy.
704 posted on 02/02/2008 4:11:24 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 703 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Besides, there’s a good John Wayne movie coming on.


705 posted on 02/02/2008 4:13:02 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 703 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
Besides, there’s a good John Wayne movie coming on.

Works for me.

706 posted on 02/02/2008 4:16:07 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 705 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

...right you are...and it would take much more than luck!!!


707 posted on 02/03/2008 11:35:35 PM PST by xc1427 (It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees...Midnight Oil (Power and the Passion))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
Correct, that was clear in the clips I saw of tonight's debate. Obama: "I would not only remove all our troops from Iraq; I would remove the basis for ever going to war."

Barack Obama's Body:

Barack Obama's Brain:


708 posted on 02/03/2008 11:47:16 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

Maybe you’re right. Maybe Rush, Levin, Hannity, Quinn Humphries etc., are all saying almost the same thing just for ratings. Maybe George Will, Malkin etc. have similar motivations. Maybe the conservative authors, talk show hosts, and pundits by the dozen that appear to be in an absolute panic over the possiblity of McCain being the GOP nominee are only motivated by the possibility of profit, and none are sincerely upset at the prospect of having the mortal emeny of conservatives get the nomination.


709 posted on 02/04/2008 4:42:26 AM PST by NavVet ( If you don't defend Conservatism in the Primaries, you won't have it to defend in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: NavVet

> Maybe you’re right. Maybe Rush, Levin, Hannity, Quinn Humphries etc., are all saying almost the same thing just for ratings. Maybe George Will, Malkin etc. have similar motivations.

Maybe to a small extent. But Ann is the Queen of Self Indulgence and Self Promotion, and has gone the extra mile to say she will *vote for* the Hildabeast. And *campaign* for her. That’s a far cry from saying that McInsane is a disaster and will wreak liberal havok... a sentiment that these other commentators and I agree with.

Any reason you are trying to make excuses for Ann?


710 posted on 02/04/2008 6:07:23 AM PST by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 709 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

I’m not trying to make excuses for anyone, but I think the accusation that Coulter is only motivated by greed is absurd. If you can’t hear the panic in her voice when she talks about McCain, you might want to use Q-tips. I don’t think she’ll campaign for Hillary, she sometimes uses over the top comments to make her point. However, I do expect she will continue to illustrate that McCain is a danger to the GOP and to the country, as will I every chance I get, right up until November.


711 posted on 02/04/2008 5:40:23 PM PST by NavVet ( If you don't defend Conservatism in the Primaries, you won't have it to defend in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 710 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

I hope you are joking.


712 posted on 02/04/2008 5:47:42 PM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

The real problem here is not Ann or Rush. The problem is the Republican party. If McCain ends up getting the nomination, then adios to the Republican party. We will need to organize and form a new conservative party. The Republican party at that point will no longer be a home for conservatives.


713 posted on 02/04/2008 5:50:16 PM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

I think the Conservative Party of New York will become national.


714 posted on 02/04/2008 6:10:12 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 713 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700701-714 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson