Replies

There is no way on God’s green Earth that I will vote for McVain.

Let’s say it’s McVain against Hitlery (AKA Evita.)

If that’s the matchup, then it might be better in some ways to vote third party and if that lets Hillary win (remember, the Dimmycraps have third party threats of their own, from McKinney, Nader, and Bloomberg), then so be it.

One candidate favors open borders, amnesty, the worst restriction of free speech since the Alien and Sedition Acts, the most massive entitlement in 40 years, international accords on the fictitious “global warming” that would destroy our standard of living, closing Gitmo and bringing the terrorists here to stand trial in our legal system, will not appoint strict constructionist judges (and says so), and opposes the Bush tax cuts, which are due to expire on the next President’s watch, and the other favors...well, exactly the same policies.

Tweedledum and Tweedledumber.

As Ann Coulter said, Hillary “lies less than John McCain and she’s smarter than John McCain.” And with Hitlery in power, it is the Dimmycraps who will be blamed for the inevitable disaster, while a McCain Administration will make it the Republicans’ responsibility. That could be the final nail in the coffin of the GOP — which isn’t necessarily a bad thing either.

If McVain is President, then all the liberal policies and the disaster they bring about will belong to the Republicans. If Hitlery is President, then they’ll belong to her and her party. In that case, you would be likely to see the GOP take back Congress in 2010 and take back the White House in 2012 — with someone who has a lot more principles than McVain and one who is VASTLY more conservative.

What worries me is that Hitlery is basically a totalitarian at heart.

One candidate favors open borders, amnesty, the worst restriction of free speech since the Alien and Sedition Acts, the most massive entitlement in 40 years, international accords on the fictitious “global warming” that would destroy our standard of living, closing Gitmo and bringing the terrorists here to stand trial in our legal system, will not appoint strict constructionist judges (and says so), and opposes the Bush tax cuts, which are due to expire on the next President’s watch, and the other favors...well, exactly the same policies.

That's a devastating summary of the situation we're facing. Very well put!

Have you looked into the Constitution Party? Nothing remotely liberal about it.

It’s not just McCain’s positions that bother me. I don’t think he has the right temperament to be President. He’s quick to anger, vindictive, and petty. I can just imagine him spouting off at Putin or some other foreign leader and getting us into a heck of a lot of trouble.

He’d be a dangerous President for so many reasons. I’m really hoping for a Romney miracle.

“If McVain is President, then all the liberal policies and the disaster they bring about will belong to the Republicans.”

That’s it in a nutshell. Even RINOS will have to oppose Hitlery every step of the way. They would be in bed with McCain.

Good argument.