It really does get old when yu have to reanswer the sme argument over and over again. You start to wonder why an honest seeker of truth can’t investigate the facts and realize that the answer is there and the charged are biased attacks ingnoring contrary evidence.
I expect this from the Bush haters. But from conservatives? I had always figured that they were more reasonable with the facts (explaining the rejection of liberalism).
Oh well.
BS. I read all of these threads about Romney and all you people have to offer are Johnny-come-lately events that supposedly ‘prove’ that his record doesn’t matter.
Look at what’s cited in this thread. That Wikipedia nonsense which so cleverly glosses over what is being spoken of in this thread, is somehow cited as proof positive that the charge is false. The page says nothing of the kind, nor does anyone else.
I’ve never read anyone actually refuting the charge here or really any of the other charges by Mass Resistance. All I hear from the MittWits is how Brian Camemaker is such a ‘nut’ or ‘extremist’, but never any facts to contradict his version of things.
If there were facts, it would be great to read them. However, there is a difference between real world facts and the ‘facts’ that are dragged out by Mitt apologists, which are nothing more than conjecture and sometimes just sheer distortions of the truth.
There are people here willing to twist themselves into pretzels to defend this guy.
If you want to say he’s the best of the lousy choices left, I would probably agree, however to pretend that Mitt Romney is any kind of conservative is an insult to conservatives.