To: G.Mason
I cannot see Hannity or Rush getting behind McCain. If they do, it would be the end of talk radio for me. I’d rather have a Dem President and rally the Conservative base and get back to our grassroots effort for the next election, than to have McCain dragging the entire party further left, with his RINO/Liberal agenda.
7 posted on
02/07/2008 4:21:29 AM PST by
Rush4U
(unnamed source)
To: Rush4U
12 posted on
02/07/2008 4:27:04 AM PST by
G.Mason
(And what is intelligence if not the craft of out-thinking our adversaries?)
To: Rush4U
I cannot see Hannity or Rush getting behind McCain. If they do, it would be the end of talk radio for me. Id rather have a Dem President and rally the Conservative base and get back to our grassroots effort for the next election, than to have McCain dragging the entire party further left, with his RINO/Liberal agenda. There will be a heavy price though. We will allow Clinton/Obama to replace all the old hag liberals on the Supreme Court with young ones. There are two liberals who probably can't make it through another term, and the two others aren't that far behind. The liberals are on the ropes on the Supreme Court, and one Democratic president can turn back our progress 25 years.
17 posted on
02/07/2008 4:32:01 AM PST by
Always Right
(Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
To: Rush4U
I cannot see Hannity or Rush getting behind McCain. If they do, it would be the end of talk radio for me.Yeah, geez, if I had known this was going to happen I would have supported Frist's abortive run for the roses. At least I *like* him, though I never thought he would be a good candidate.
80 posted on
02/07/2008 6:32:53 AM PST by
ichabod1
("Self defense is not only our right, it is our duty." President Ronald Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson