Ambassador Keyes, a true committed conservative (except what’s the reparations thing?) hits it square on the head with his comments on both of these liberal phonies, and no matter how much spin anyone tries to employ to say otherwise, Keyes states exactly why conservatives and voters rejected Romney and why conservatives won’t back McCain.
While Mitt was supporting the slaughter of innocent pre-borns as governor of Massachusetts prior to his “miraculous” change of heart and while McCain was stabbing conservatives in the back at every turn possible, Alan Keyes was devoting his time to being a leading activist opposing the culture of death in our country. He is a man of integrity and passion who understands that the entire basis of conservatism is liberty and that there is no liberty without protecting life from conception to natural death. Neither of these two liberal yo-yos can match his commitment and integrity.
If I saw someone in an alley holding a gun to someone's head, about to pull the trigger, I would be right to kill that person on the spot to save an innocent life.
If someone told you that they would kill an innocent child at a specific time and place, you would certainly show up at that time and place, and if it were true, would kill the evil man who was going to kill the innocent child.
So if you have not personally shown up at an abortion clinic, were you know for a fact that an innocent child is going to be brutally murdered, and walked into that building, and finding the evil man poised to commit murder, killed him, then you too have innocent blood on your hands.
In other words, you smear about "innocent blood on hands", is absurd.
All of us have the blood of innocents on our hands. Romney no more than the rest of us who KNOW what is happening and have done nothing of real consequence.
Oh, except that we convinced a man who could win for president to RUN FOR OFFICE, and to support life, and to promise to appoint judges who would overturn Roe. Except some pro-lifers attacked that man, smeared him with the "blood of innocents" crap, and maybe have contributed to 40 more years of abortion if a democrat wins the election.
Maybe THOSE people have the blood of innocents on their hands.
If you succeeded in getting Keyes as our nominee, only to have him fail miserably as he would in the general election, then maybe you would have the blood of innocents on your hands, since there were other candidates who would have WON and would have put the right judges on the court, but you rejected them and instead picked a man who could not win, thus giving the white house to pro-abortion democrats.
See, it is much easier to just spout off about "blood of innocents" than it is to actually reason and do what is right.