Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NH: Rare gun-control bill sparks unanimous backlash (video)
RidleyReport.com ^

Posted on 02/11/2008 10:57:07 AM PST by Dada Orwell

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Dada Orwell

Wow! She is really, really, clueless. Amazing.


21 posted on 02/11/2008 6:25:45 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

“You might duck and be too late.”

You missed my point. She said in the video what happens if people are allowed to carry guns and a crazed killer comes in shooting people and then lawfully armed people pull out their guns and start shooting back. Then her question was, what are the rest of us supposed to do? Duck? My point was that even if lawfully armed citizens were not shooting back, that’s all she’s going to do anyways is duck...


22 posted on 02/12/2008 5:13:44 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

I find her distorted, tortured logic disturbing on many levels; She would rather not fight back? She would rather others (other than law enforcement) not be able to fight back, possibly to her benefit. She would rather be a victim to a crazed mass murderer killing innocent than be bothered with the idea that others had the ability to stop that crazed killer. She would rather her safety be totally on the shoulders of police? Who don’t have to risk their lives for yours. I would rather be part of the solution, and try to stop the evil doer.
Heck, I would rather be accidentally hit by the bullet of a “friendly” citizen fighting back, while fighting the evil doer, than to just be victimized by the evil doer. To claim it is best not to fight back is, in this case, immoral. Pacifism is not moral high ground.


23 posted on 02/13/2008 11:54:41 AM PST by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: William Tell

They had the suspect in custody when the shooting started. He was a former boyfriend of the girl who was killed and they arrested him outside the middle school that my kids attend. When the shooting broke out, they realized they had the wrong guy. Note: At the time, he was arrested, a kid was trying to sell pistols out of a backpack in that same middle school.


24 posted on 02/13/2008 11:58:15 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
AppyPappy said: "They had the suspect in custody when the shooting started."

Then I think you mean that they had "a" suspect in custody, not necessarily "the" suspect. If an alarm system had existed, I doubt that it would have been triggered.

The liberals continue to seek some way to stop an armed killer from killing people that does not involve having the threatened people fight back effectively. I can't figure out how any creature with testosterone in their system can think this way.

25 posted on 02/13/2008 1:14:33 PM PST by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson