Posted on 02/12/2008 2:17:28 PM PST by blam
And it appears it was also owned by the Chinese....
That’s some terrain!
“”Because mining is an extractive industry, it tends to destroy archaeological evidence,” he said.”
Digging a hole to find a hole...
The discovery sheds light specifically on how hematite was used by the Nasca, who flourished along the Pacific coast from about 100 B.C. to around A.D. 600.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Well,,,Strike me with a feather!
Aren’t these the very times that the Book of Mormon peoples were supposed to be using “steel”?
So basically this hematite/iron mine was used for paint pigment. There is no indication of any iron smelting.
According to Sitchin (Lost Realms), the Sumerians (or their gods) were mining tin and copper ca 4000-3000 BC by Lake Titicaca and making bronze.
He claims that the ruins at Tiahuanaco are not “temples” but an ore-refining site and that TI.ANA.KU in Sumerian means “City Bright Tin”.
Interesting supposition — or flight of fancy, depending upon your outlook.
But evidence is not what is needed. In fact, it’s the opposite of real knowledge, but you knew that.
RLDS Book of Mormon.
2 Nephi Chapter 5 [15]
And I did teach my people to build buildings, and to work in all manner of wood, and of iron, and of copper, and of brass, and of steel, and of gold, and of silver, and of precious ores, which were in great abundance.
The LDS Book of Mormon is numbered different.
That would be a hell of a commute.
The time frame overlaps the last few centuries of the Book of Mormon peoples and a couple centuries after their civilization collapsed, the location is somewhat close to the region where most scholars think the BoM peoples lived. I would guess the people mining here were neighbors of the BoM peoples.
Resty, could you do the honors and ping the others? Thanks.
Obviously there ARE iron smelting sites. This is not one of them, nor is this the appropriate time frame for what you wish to prove by evidence.
Steel? Now that is entirely a different matter.
It is you who are looking to disprove by evidence or lack thereof, I clearly stated quite the opposite, that ‘evidence’ will get you nowhere. If you wish to argue, take it someplace else please.
I’m not looking for anything. Where did you get that?
I stated that there was now smelting at this site. Now don’t go away mad, just go away.
“What we found is the only hematite mine, a type of iron also known as ochre, recorded in South America prior to the Spanish conquest. This discovery demonstrates that iron ores were important to ancient Andean civilizations.”
SOURCE: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080129125405.htm
“Hematite derives its name from the Greek word haimatites, meaning “bloodlike,” an allusion to the vivid red color of the powdered stone. The red powdered hematite, ochre (also spelled ocher), is used as a pigment with many uses presently and throughout history. Red ochre was used by prehistoric artists in their cave paintings. It was used by the ancient Egyptians in religious ceremonies, and as an inscription stone for passages in the Book of the Dead. Native Americans also used ochre as red face paint. Currently, powdered hematite is used in lapidary as a rouge polish and as a pigment in paints and crayons.”
SOURCE: http://www.mamasminerals.com/latestissue.html
Wanna start a new thread? ;-)
CTR
btt
“Swords of the finest steel...”
Is how I recollect it. (Open to correction on this point.)
It rather stood out as anachonistic. I don’t know the dating on the peoples mentioned in the book of Mormon. But steel did not exist in any quantity during the bronze or iron age. I believe some was made in India. Mass production happened after the introducation of the Bessemer process.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.