Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Travis McGee
THose troops have homes and dependents mingled among the population they would be trying to suppress.

That goes to my point. The notion of the civilian populace defeating the military is a forlorn fantasy. In that unlikely and nightmarish extreme, the role of the rebels would be to hold out long enough to convince the military, or elements of it, to flip to the other side.

The Reserves and Guard would flip first. They don't usually live on base, and are fully integrated into civilian life. If things are cast in us-and-them terms, they're more likely to consider themselves one of the "them."

I sincerely hope we never have the opportunity to test either sides of that equation.

Amen.

93 posted on 02/15/2008 10:42:24 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: ReignOfError

The Reserves and Guard would flip first. They don't usually live on base, and are fully integrated into civilian life. If things are cast in us-and-them terms, they're more likely to consider themselves one of the "them."

I would like to agree, but visions of Kent State or the use of military against vets (post WW1) pop into my mind.

The Bonus Army

Kent State

111 posted on 02/16/2008 12:23:42 AM PST by Sarajevo (You're just jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson