Do you have an actual link to this NYT story?
This won’t solve a damn thing.
This is satire, isn’t it? Please, tell me so. I know President Bush is visiting Africa- but he’s not intending to come home to Zimbabwe, is he?
Clue # 1. There is no link to the NYT.
Clue # 2. You’re getting a CHECK from the gov for your rebate, not an envelope full of brand new cash.
Therefore.....you’ve been punked!
Question: What's the price of a bottle of beer?
Now take another dollar out of your wallet and throw it into your newly-created economy.
Question: Now what's the price of a bottle of beer?
It's that simple.
Separately, Presidential Candidate Baracks Obamarama has put forth his own bid for the hearts and pocketbooks of Americans.
With an opening bid of $1,000,000 per American, Obamarama intends to outbid the U.S. Government under the weak-kneed "leadership" of President Bush and Ben(dover) Bernanke.
"We feel that if $1,000 is good, then $1,000,000 is better," said Senator Obamarama.
"Democrats can oil the printing presses faster than the Republicans, and anything less that $1 million just shows how heartless Republicans are."
Lines at the Federal Treasury wrapped around several blocks waiting for the printing of the Checks.
"Obama's my man, and if I have to wait here until January 22nd of 2009, I'll be first in line for the Obamarama checks," said Sydney Hogfart. "I been gettin' these gubmint checks for years, and Obamarama's just gonna add a few more zeroes. He's so compassionate, not like that last guy."
In other news, Ben(dover) Bernanke threw open the gates of Fort Knox, and within minutes, the gold bars were headed to the four winds. "I feel that liquidity is key to market performance, and Wall Street promised me a real sweet bl*w j*b if I did it. I'll be in Suite 69 at the Watergate, boys!"
Finally, in possibly related news, extreme seismic activity was picked up on the Richter monitors, with an epicenter in a graveyard in Palo Alto. A witness to the event, Rose Friedman, said the earth veritably heaved. "I don't know what's going on," said Rose, "I don't read the papers anymore after that McWhatsisname. But my Miltie must've heard something."
Breadlines formed in Chicago where wheelbarrows of greenbacks were being burned to fuel the ovens.
"I just can't get enough of this good economic news," exclaimed Presidential Candidate John McIgnorant. "I never did take Economics, and I really don't know where my paycheck comes from. But when money is flowing in the streets, it makes people happy, and dagummit, I like that!"
Chinese Naval Vessels were seen disembarking all ports and steaming East at full speed.
This doesn’t pass the smell test. It’s a Hawkeye Onion article, right?
The Heads of the Department of Economic Orthodoxy are confused by the (satire) tag.
There is a new theory in economics I’ve seen called “imaginary money”, that explains a lot of our current worldwide problems.
World economies have not been based on anything “real” for a long time. Even only a tiny fraction of highly denominated paper represents the vast majority of money out there. Sometimes it is said that money today is based on the “faith” standard.
The world could get away with this for many years, because instead of basing currency strength on “real” things, it was based in the “dynamics” of an economy and how much it traded with other economies.
But then a new factor entered in to the equation. People and government started to cheat, or allow cheating to create the illusion of money that is supported by nothing.
And this is what is called “imaginary money”. Imaginary money begins with inflation, which benefits debtors, be they individuals, corporations, or governments. But eventually, “imaginary money” becomes “value added” money, but value added for no reason.
Say you go to a bank to take out a loan, using your house for collateral. Your house is worth $250k, but somehow you persuade your bank to loan you $1 million dollars, using that house as collateral. Instantly, the bank has created $750k of “imaginary money”, money that exists, and can be spent on things, but has no *reason* to exist. They shouldn’t have given it to you.
Continuing with this model. Say you take your $1M loan, and go buy four more houses with it, with the idea that their value will appreciate, and you can sell them for more then you paid for them, thus making a profit and being able to pay back your loan.
But instead, you take the deeds to these four houses to the bank the next day, as use them as collateral to get a $4M dollar loan. Again, the bank using very poor judgment in loaning you that money.
The is simplistic description of how the Savings & Loan crisis happened. It cost the US treasury $500 BILLION dollars to rectify, and cost hundreds of thousands of people the loss of “real” money.
But imaginary money is created everywhere. If you earn $1, you owe the government tax on that dollar. But when you spend that dollar, whoever gets it *also* owes tax on that dollar. After just four or five transactions, more imaginary tax money is owed based on that dollar than the value of that $1.
Oddly enough, this tax rebate does not create imaginary money, because it is, and remains, “real” money, at least as far as the old definition went. Full faith and credit of the US government.
Which is worth as little or as much as you want.