Posted on 02/22/2008 6:34:40 AM PST by jdm
That too...
Nancy’s husband had already been elected, lol. And,she was HELPFUL to him, overall.
You know what I mean.
I guess you’re right, they can do whatever they want afterwards. I wish I would have known about the astrologer, I would have been able to direct my vote according to my horoscope. LOL!
Take your favorite Republican candidate, past or present, be it John McCain, Huckabee, Thompson, Romney, etc. Now, imagine that one of their wives wrote a scathing Anti-American, racist paper in college. That wouldn’t impact who you’re voting for?
And I’m not saying Obama’s wife did write such a paper, but why is Princeton being so protective all of a sudden, if there’s no reason to be?
When you can show me the spouse is pushing the president's policy buttons, sitting on a major cabinet post, or has decided to wear a burqa, then I'll do so.
Example, if I had known that Hills was going to develop the proposal for health care, I would have wanted to know her views. I wasn't voting for him anyway, but it should have been a campaign issue, against them.
They want to hide her Marxist views as much as his.
You nailed it.
If Michelle Obama’s thesis is no big deal, why is it on lock down?
Exactly. She spoke at a college bitching about hers and her husband’s student loans that she claimed would take years to repay had her brilliant husband not written two best selling books. She ranted about how poor off those seeking to be teachers or in the social field would be.
It was all a bash America, you deserve more right now speech.
I wouldn’t call her a skank, but I DO agree that she is going to be his undoing. She is quite class-less, actually, for being such an accomplished and intelligent professional. She needs to attend the Laura Bush Charm School to know how to act like a lady.
Watch Michelle Obama do the same thing, if Obama wins the Presidency.
I think you have to differentiate between which candidates spouses are really into politics and massive change, as the Obama's most certainly are.
Obviously, as you pointed out, Hillary was very political and wanting of power, otherwise she wouldn't have started all that health care BS way back in 1993, not long after Slick Willie was sworn in.
On the other hand, we didn't need to worry about Nancy Reagan or Laura Bush or Barbara Bush because they are not (or were not) as interested in changing the country as we know it as much as BOTH Barack Obama AND Michelle Obama are.
Nancy, Laura and Barbara were more less neutral throughout their husband's presidencies. They are not fanatics like Michelle Obama.
That's the difference.
She was alone in a world of whites? I hope not.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/10/AR2007051002573.html
So, her thesis was based on black alumni.
Well, that settles it then. Let’s have the candidates provide background on their psychics.
I agree very much with your second paragraph. But I don't trust them to tell us in advance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.