Replies

After much flaming, and realizing the mistake of my original comment, and some of my subsequent comments, I’ve acknowledged that I did not think through my comments very well. I offer my apology to you for my poorly thought out words. I hope you will accept that apology. I’d rather fight on your side than the other side of this issue.

I'll accept your apology, but your opinion "You can justify your position all you want using anecdotes from the 1700’s, but that doesn’t mean you have a valid argument in today’s world" is about as bad as comment as I've ever heard someone say here on FR.

Just extraordinarily bad. Fundamentally bad. Looking on you from here on with grave suspicion bad.

Bad as in "What is his son risking his life for, exactly, if his dad thinks like that?" bad.

Apology accepted, I guess.

After much flaming, and realizing the mistake of my original comment, and some of my subsequent comments, I’ve acknowledged that I did not think through my comments very well. I offer my apology to you for my poorly thought out words. I hope you will accept that apology. I’d rather fight on your side than the other side of this issue.

As stated a few posts above, some responses, including a few of my last ones, were made prior to the 200 post mark. Apology accepted. Hope you'll accept mine as well for my "strident" retorts. As I stated in another post, we natives are a bit nervous now. We envision more attacks coming on our Constitutional rights after the next election, and react accordingly. I think you've seen that...LOL.

You, sir, are a honorable man, for clarifying your points, and admitting your error in formulating them in the first place. I will be the first to admit that I am guilty of that very thing myself from time to time. We've let Jim Zumbo back "into the fold". You are welcome as well. :)