Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just mythoughts

I have not forgot. But, this is a fact of history: Clinton did TRY and balance a budget. This is also a fact of history: Bush hasn’t evidently given it 2 thoughts. He has given us the 6 worst years in the history of the US, 5 of the 6 individually are the single worst in history by themselves. Collectively, Bush has, what, doubled the national debt or some idiotic percentage.

And, yes, Bush may realize that you can’t buy liberal love. But, you can be assimilated by them and turned into a fiscal liberal.


19 posted on 02/26/2008 8:53:03 AM PST by Lord_Calvinus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Lord_Calvinus
Ah, but President Bush came into office telling US he gives what the liberal asketh. He had a war to fight and so he fought but these liberals were not satisfied with the spending concession they planted hatred of said President Bush to the core of this nation.
20 posted on 02/26/2008 8:57:04 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Isa.3:4 And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Lord_Calvinus
Clinton had nothing to do with the balanced budget. It was Newt Gingrich and the Contract with America that cut SPENDING.

If you go back and watch Clinton's SOTU speeches the first 2 years, he stated "Deficits as far as the eye can see". When Newt took over, remember the gubmint shutdown? He held the line on spending and FORCED the issue on Billy.

22 posted on 02/26/2008 9:16:45 AM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson