Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo
Many of the participants in this conference are people who have already expressed skepticism about either the prevailing explanations of current climate change or the dire predictions about future climate change.

SHOCKED, I tell you. I am SHOCKED that this conference sponsored by the Heartland institute would include people that had ALREADY expressed skepticism about climate change like this! Doesn't the Heartland Institute, who is actually PAYING these participants to come to the meeting (and to stay in one of New York's finest hotels to boot!), know that there is a scientific consensus on this issue? I think it is APPALLING that such a noteworthy organization as the Heartland Institute would actually INVITE and PAY these scientists to express their views PUBLICALLY, in a conference attended by other like-minded SCIENTISTS.

I'll be shaking my head all day about this.

17 posted on 02/28/2008 8:36:22 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cogitator

I’m sure the pro-global warming conferences include a variety of scientists with diverse points of view on this subject?


37 posted on 02/28/2008 12:00:45 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Cloverfield 2008! Why vote for a lesser monster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: cogitator

You don’t think that all those scientists and hanger-ons from the warming side paid their own way to the previous conferences, do you?

Dismissing things out of hand, especially before they even take place, intimates a bit of bias.

At least these guys aren’t holding the conference in a tropical area while the rest of the planet freezes:

“A new and very different conference on global warming will be held in New York City, under the sponsorship of the Heartland Institute, on March 2nd to March 4th — weather permitting.”

http://www.heartland.org/NewYork08/ConferenceSchedule.pdf


44 posted on 02/28/2008 12:58:04 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: cogitator

You don’t think that all those scientists and hanger-ons from the warming side paid their own way to the previous conferences, do you?

Dismissing things out of hand, especially before they even take place, intimates a bit of bias.

At least these guys aren’t holding the conference in a tropical area while the rest of the planet freezes:

“A new and very different conference on global warming will be held in New York City, under the sponsorship of the Heartland Institute, on March 2nd to March 4th — weather permitting.”

http://www.heartland.org/NewYork08/ConferenceSchedule.pdf


45 posted on 02/28/2008 12:58:51 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: cogitator

Sorry for the double post but I was dropped offf the browser and had to open a new window to repost.


46 posted on 02/28/2008 1:00:56 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: cogitator
Doesn't the Heartland Institute...know that there is a scientific consensus on this issue?

And what weight does that carry?

There has been scientific consensus on a great many ideas in the past before they were blown out of the water by observation and a little clear thought.

Do the names Copernicus and Kepler ring a bell?

63 posted on 02/29/2008 6:47:30 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Great spirits will always encounter violent opposition from mediocre minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson