Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force goes European with new refueling planes
Hot Air ^ | March 01, 2008 | by Ed Morrissey

Posted on 03/01/2008 7:42:30 AM PST by jdm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-211 next last
To: dragnet2
I have no idea whether this decision is a good one or not, though I doubt the Air Force would be stupid enough to shoot themselves in the foot. I do believe in getting the facts right and after the Dubai ports deal I have learned that people are easily swayed when deeply held preconceptions are reinforced with a little misinformation.
101 posted on 03/01/2008 9:22:50 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie
I have no idea whether this decision is a good one or not, though I doubt the Air Force would be stupid enough to shoot themselves in the foot.

I tend to agree. And this is a major plus for California. So....

102 posted on 03/01/2008 9:24:07 AM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

Last time I checked, Northrup is an American company. Read the fine article. America works because of competition. If Boeing and people like yourself can’t accept that, you deserve what you get.


103 posted on 03/01/2008 9:24:14 AM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2
ast time I checked, Northrup is an American company

Specifically, a California based company.

104 posted on 03/01/2008 9:25:18 AM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
Arkansas is next.

Link

25 more states to go.

105 posted on 03/01/2008 9:26:03 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62; nyconse
Never mind the economic standpoint of Boeing’s loss...what about seeing this from a NATIONAL SECURITY standpoint? If it flies for AMERICA, build the WHOLE DARN THING in AMERICA!!!

Never mind the facts, just use emotion and empty rhetoric!

http://www.boeingchina.com/en/aboutboeing/chronology.shtml

106 posted on 03/01/2008 9:28:24 AM PST by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
Next is California.

Link

24 more states to document.

107 posted on 03/01/2008 9:28:55 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
24 more states to document.

Please don't spam the thread.

108 posted on 03/01/2008 9:30:06 AM PST by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: jdm

How stupid is this? If the Republicans had any shred of possibility for winning in November, the Air Force idiots just blew it away. As a result, the Dems will come in and cancel the contract and refuse to build any more planes or spend another dime on the military.
A
Makes me wonder how safe we are with idiots like this running the Air Force. Obama has decreed that he won’t even spend a cent on military research much less equipment and supplies. Aren’t they listening? Is anyone?

Cover your ears. Hillary is going to be all over this like a rash. And McCain can’t defend it.


109 posted on 03/01/2008 9:30:34 AM PST by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

I would go further and say that if you think McCain and the Republican’s platform in Ohio could be summarized as “we want to make Boeing be the next GM and the state of Ohio the next Detroit”, then they certainly wouldn’t get my vote.


110 posted on 03/01/2008 9:36:16 AM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

Things have progressed some now. We routinely run simulators of automated equipment with a snooper that looks for unused lines of code. We run the unit through all of the parameters and errors and then look for stuff that was never used. Cuts way down on the search.


111 posted on 03/01/2008 9:37:10 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
I like the 747 idea. There are hundreds of them around that could be refurbed and put into service.
112 posted on 03/01/2008 9:39:14 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

We are only up to the "M's", I could go on.

113 posted on 03/01/2008 9:41:00 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2

“Linking the fate of the Republican party to that of a defense contractor is a dubious form of patriotism.”

That’s corporatethink. Republicans ought to try some Humanspeak, like “We’re keeping thousands of jobs here in the USA.” That’s what wins elections.

The USAF contracting office did not work hard enough with Boeing to negotiate the best plane at the best price. Government agencies are notoriously bad at negotiating.


114 posted on 03/01/2008 9:41:44 AM PST by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

The cost changes that will be added through the change order process will equalize any of the concerns you note.


115 posted on 03/01/2008 9:42:22 AM PST by Shanty Shaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Please don't spam the thread.

Your post is spam. My posts document jobs created. You have a problem with that?

116 posted on 03/01/2008 9:42:37 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

You won’t vote for a Republican, you can’t vote for a Dem (I assume) and Bloomberg announced last week that he won’t get in. I was hoping he would, as he has the brains to get the USA back on the right financial track, if anyone does.

Come to think of it, perhaps he thinks the economy is unfixable.


117 posted on 03/01/2008 9:47:10 AM PST by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jdm
My information is dated, but for what it's worth:

last I heard, the only thing keeping C-17 alive was Boeing internal funding and lame hopes for foreign sales. AF was showing little willingness to go beyond the 220+ already on order...onsies and twosies (spec ops etc) but about 230 AC total. Editorializing about some "historical partnership" is stretching the point as far as Long Beach is concerned.

Boeing has been happily dismantling the old MDC facility here and developing the real estate. Commercial facilities are gone and only C-17 and some support services remain for the most part. (They did leave the "Home of the Douglas Jets" sign either as a gift or a poke in the eye)

I think the C-17 tooling all belongs to Boeing and once it starts coming down the cost of starting over would buy you a medium sized country.

Profit in large AC is in their sustainment...decades worth of parts for these planes will have to come from Europe. Put another way - building them is the cheap part, sustaining them in service is where the real money is and that money will be going to the existing European suppliers and not to Alabama. Remember that these are based on existing (euro) aircraft and economy does not come from replacing current parts with American substitutes,also, support (actually hanging parts on the AC) will probably take place at AF depots. (Nowhere in the news releases have I seen the phrase "lifetime cost" and that's usually a gov. mantra)

I've read that the RFP drove Boeing to the smaller AC but it's also true that they wanted a new role for 737 specifically and the AF had wanted that plane before. Never saw the spec so that's rumor.

Some of the posts here claim the EADS AC has more capabilities. They both meet the specification but Airbus does it on a bigger platform. Not more capabilities but higher capacity (we are told).

118 posted on 03/01/2008 9:47:21 AM PST by norton (house for sale cheap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2
I would go further and say that if you think McCain and the Republican’s platform in Ohio could be summarized as “we want to make Boeing be the next GM and the state of Ohio the next Detroit”, then they certainly wouldn’t get my vote.

Did you say Ohio?

Link
119 posted on 03/01/2008 9:52:32 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

What irritates me the most is so-called “Conservatives” harping on how winning government contracts creates jobs or how creating special incentives will attract this company into some region and create umpity-ump jobs when the effect overall is more than often irrelevant to the local economy or even worse for the country. What they’re really doing is screwing up the market and the taxpayers... something that Ted Kennedy Democrats are for.


120 posted on 03/01/2008 9:54:51 AM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson