Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: roamer_1

W Bush was much more liberal than Dole. Dole wanted to abolish 4 cabinet depts and he understood foreign affairs.

W advocated “compassionate conservatism”, expanded the size of govt and gave up on the balanced budget. The republican agenda shifted from the contract with america to giving pork to local districts to keep incumbents in power. The Chris Shays of the 90’s was more conservative than the Tom Delay of the 00’s


94 posted on 03/07/2008 12:07:39 AM PST by ari-freedom (We need more conservatives like Buckley and fewer Coulters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: ari-freedom
W advocated “compassionate conservatism”, expanded the size of govt and gave up on the balanced budget. The republican agenda shifted from the contract with america to giving pork to local districts to keep incumbents in power.

But that is not what was peddled at election time. All was Conservatism. People were willing to bet on W, even after his father, because he sold himself as a solid Conservative. By his second election, the only reason he got in is because of the war. The same with the House and Senate. They sold Conservatism.

The difference is the tone in leadership, and the control of the leadership in getting seats elected. It is the Baker "Big Tent" you are complaining about, and you are about to vote for yet another Baker moderate, and Bush's heir apparent.

the only way to get what you want, the Reagan Conservatism, the Contract with America, is to burn that big tent down.

96 posted on 03/07/2008 12:18:26 AM PST by roamer_1 (Conservative always, Republican no more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson