Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeDude

I disagree. Bush sided with the illegal in this case knowing that his decision would not hold up in court. This allowed him to play the diplomacy card while ensuring the illegal would not go free. I know there are a lot of Bush haters, but he has more smarts (and a better staff) than he is credited with.


13 posted on 03/25/2008 7:48:32 AM PDT by Skenderbej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Skenderbej

Right... just like he thought that the Supreme Court would never uphold McCain-Feingold.

His sworn duty is to the Constitution — not to play Rovian games.


21 posted on 03/25/2008 7:53:49 AM PDT by rom (Real Conservatives don't vote for Socialists with an (R) next to their name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej

>>Bush sided with the illegal in this case knowing that his decision would not hold up in court.<<

I wont say it is a fact, but I suspect you are right.


22 posted on 03/25/2008 7:54:04 AM PDT by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej

Screw that. I don’t want my President playing kissie face with the thugs who run Mexico and I sure as hell don’t want my President holding hands with the King of Saudi Arabia who finances radical Wahhabist mosques in the USA.


28 posted on 03/25/2008 8:01:48 AM PDT by PeterFinn (I am not voting for McCain. No way, no how.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej
I disagree. Bush sided with the illegal in this case knowing that his decision would not hold up in court. This allowed him to play the diplomacy card while ensuring the illegal would not go free. I know there are a lot of Bush haters, but he has more smarts (and a better staff) than he is credited with.

Well, if that isn't a pant load. There aren't that many Bush haters here, many of us just aren't impressed with either his liberal leanings or his "smarts". Being unhappy with is not the same thing as hating. Also, as someone else pointed out, his job is uphold the Constitution and not play political games.

37 posted on 03/25/2008 8:11:49 AM PDT by pt17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej

I disagree. Bush sided with the illegal in this case knowing that his decision would not hold up in court. This allowed him to play the diplomacy card while ensuring the illegal would not go free. I know there are a lot of Bush haters, but he has more smarts (and a better staff) than he is credited with.”

You know what would be interesting? What if we made the President SWEAR TO UPHOLD the Constitution. Maybe that would change things.

Oh, wait a second....


39 posted on 03/25/2008 8:13:51 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej
Bush sided with the illegal in this case knowing that his decision would not hold up in court. This allowed him to play the diplomacy card while ensuring the illegal would not go free.

Bovine scatology! Bush is, quite simply, an open-borders, suck-up-to-Mexico, illegal-alien-loving guy. Where's the fence?

42 posted on 03/25/2008 8:17:51 AM PDT by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej
"Bush sided with the illegal in this case knowing that his decision would not hold up in court. This allowed him to play the diplomacy card while ensuring the illegal would not go free. I know there are a lot of Bush haters, but he has more smarts (and a better staff) than he is credited with."

Yeah...and why does he side with illegals & Mexico on the border fence, amnesty, locking up Border Patrol agents doing their job, calling Minutemen vigilantes.... Do I have to go on?

B.S.! When it comes to illegals and Mexico, Bush always puts America 2nd... and that sadly is the unescapable truth.

50 posted on 03/25/2008 8:44:22 AM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej
I disagree. Bush sided with the illegal in this case knowing that his decision would not hold up in court. This allowed him to play the diplomacy card while ensuring the illegal would not go free. I know there are a lot of Bush haters, but he has more smarts (and a better staff) than he is credited with.

I was going to tell you that you are nutz if you believe that, but I see a whole lot of other people did it already, so I won't. LOL

54 posted on 03/25/2008 9:17:18 AM PDT by NRA2BFree ("The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej

No offense, but I really do not see “he was just playing politics” as a tactic that appeals to the average conservative. I’d have more admiration for one who gives more consideration to doing what is right than to doing what is *politically* right.


55 posted on 03/25/2008 9:23:26 AM PDT by mquinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej

If what you’re suggesting is true, that makes the President look far worse than if he had simply come to an inaccurate conclusion about the law.


56 posted on 03/25/2008 9:27:41 AM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej; ConservativeDude; Jane Austen

I disagree. Bush sided with the illegal in this case knowing that his decision would not hold up in court. This allowed him to play the diplomacy card while ensuring the illegal would not go free. I know there are a lot of Bush haters, but he has more smarts (and a better staff) than he is credited with.


I think so, too. He, I think, loves to act dumb. Now he can do his hey-I-tried-we-have-a-system-of-checks-and-balances-dontchaknow schtick.

Thank you for Roberts and Alito, President Bush.


57 posted on 03/25/2008 9:32:50 AM PDT by definitelynotaliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej
You are totally right...and very perceptive. ;^)
60 posted on 03/25/2008 9:42:42 AM PDT by top 2 toe red (Nope. No capital letters for the clintons, bill or hill, ever again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej
I disagree. Bush sided with the illegal in this case knowing that his decision would not hold up in court. This allowed him to play the diplomacy card while ensuring the illegal would not go free. I know there are a lot of Bush haters, but he has more smarts (and a better staff) than he is credited with.

If what you say is the reason, I wouldn't call it smart in the least. He once again showed citizens that he has a disdain for us all and most especially for those that are for enforcing our existing illegal immigration laws.
68 posted on 03/25/2008 10:40:13 AM PDT by CottonBall (A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority. "Civil Disobedience", Henry D.Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej

I think you are probably correct but we thought he would veto CFR and then that CFR would be struck down in any event etc

one can be too clever by half


71 posted on 03/25/2008 10:51:22 AM PDT by wardaddy (Obama: The candidate for those who think Deliverance was a documentary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej

I agree with you.


74 posted on 03/25/2008 12:42:07 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej
I disagree. Bush sided with the illegal in this case knowing that his decision would not hold up in court.

Just like he signed Campaign Finance Reform knowing it wouldn't hold up in Court? Bush is basically as smart as a box of rocks when it comes to the law and securing the United States.

He sided with mexico because he has loyalties to mexico that can't be explained.

81 posted on 03/26/2008 3:26:27 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej
"I disagree. Bush sided with the illegal in this case knowing that his decision would not hold up in court. "

Is this why Bush signed McCain-Feingold?

96 posted on 03/26/2008 11:14:56 PM PDT by matthew fuller (United We Stand- Diversified We Fall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skenderbej

Thanks you.


109 posted on 03/29/2008 9:15:28 PM PDT by pacpam (action=consequence and applies in all cases - friend of victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson