Remarks By John McCain To The Los Angeles World Affairs Council (Today's foreign policy speech)

JohnMcCain ^ | March 26, 2008 | John McCain

[calcowgirl]

Cleaning fish would be preferable to voting for McCain.

ROFL!

[SoCalPol]

I guess because I don’t like Hitlery and Obama, your candidates you find child like comebacks.
AS far as your level goes, it would take several pages of the DSM to list your situations.

[Antoninus]

I only skimmed it but it seemed like a fairly good speech. I’m willing to give this guy a chance.

[Grunthor]

You are correct about his stance on the criminal invaders of the nation. That alone is enough for me to not cast my vote for him, and to attempt to convey to others why a vote cast of fear, is usually cast against ones’ own best interest.

[calcowgirl]

Watch the reruns of him actually giving the speech.
And grab a barf bag, or two.

[Grunthor]

“BTW, Nancy Reagan has endorsed McCain”

They are both FOR the killing and mutilation of unborn babies in order to further “science.”

This was no shock to anyone.

[cripplecreek]

I’m writing in Duncan Hunter.

[Grunthor]

“I’m writing in Duncan Hunter”

I believe that I will do the same.

[dforest]

The Democraps are already whining that McCain has stolen their agenda.

Now ain’t that just so special? /s-extreme!

[roamer_1]

“Americans north and south share a common geography and a common destiny. The countries of Latin America are the natural partners of the United States, and our northern neighbor Canada.”

Sorry, that’s as far as I could get. Common destiny? If McCain has his way we’ll be just another latino speaking 3rd world country.

Yeah, me too. "New World Order", NAU/SPP, Globalist doublespeak. This guy has to be stopped.

[Dane]

If McCain wins it will be because he picks up the Clinton democrats and his supporters will deserve every liberal policy he puts in place.

Yeah just like the Reagan democrats.

You all just hate it that you are losing influence, and it shows on this thread.

Just a suggestion, maybe you all should change your marketing campaign, yes it sells in your own little echo chamber niche, but it does not sell to the general US electorate.

[Czar]

"Will they do the same thing they've done in California, making every excuse for the liberal behavior of their new elected "Republican" after the election?"

Of course they will. Being the GOP/RNC Big Tent RINOs they actually are--rather than the true conservatives they always claim to be--it's what they always do, and this time will be no different.

"No matter who gets elected, we should be prepared to fight the liberalism that will be coming out of the White House."

Exactly as we have had to do with Bush, except this will be much tougher with the bullheaded nasty-tempered McCain.

[cripplecreek]

Yeah just like the Reagan democrats.

The Reagan democrats weren't socialists and Marxists. The fact that you sound happy to have the Clinton democrats exposes you for what you are. Now ooze back under your rotten log.

[Dane]

The Reagan democrats weren't socialists and Marxists.

Really? I guess in your world FDR never won 4 terms and Truman a second term.

[AuntB]

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a38b7e6657eee.htm

[calcowgirl]

Exactly as we have had to do with Bush, except this will be much tougher with the bullheaded nasty-tempered McCain.

I see McCain as much, much worse than Bush ever was--possibly worse than Arnie has been (if that is possible.)

[Cacique]

btt

[Jane Austen]

I did not know until yesterday that apparently Nancy Reagan is friends with Chris Matthews. Chris knew a week in advance that she would make this endorsement but promised her to keep it to himself. Most endorsements do not mean much.

[calcowgirl]

Sorry, that’s as far as I could get. Common destiny?

It sounds like the Aztlan folks chanting "manifest destiny."

I'm so sick of hearing "the Americas" from these politicians.

[cripplecreek]

Most endorsements do not mean much.

Endorsements mean very little to me.