Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CapnJack

The Socialist argument for eliminating the electoral college is disingenuous. Doing so means Presidents will be selected either through the domination of one populous region over others or the domination of metropolitan areas over rural areas.

Metropolitan areas have a majority of Socialists. It encourages Presidential candidates to bring together coalitions of states instead of supporting regional differences.


10 posted on 03/28/2008 3:53:31 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Man50D
. . . the domination of one populous region over others or the domination of metropolitan areas over rural areas.

Precisely. It would be the same situation we in upstate New York find ourselves in. New York City completely dominates Albany to the effect that fairly conservative and economically-dying upstate has no choice but to submit to socialist New Yorkers.

I was going to say that perhaps the electoral college isn't perfect, but on reflection, I think maybe it is.

60 posted on 03/28/2008 6:04:01 AM PDT by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson