Posted on 03/31/2008 8:36:23 AM PDT by Cinnamon Girl
You are correct and I don't even feign to disagree. What I will say however is that the battle (siege) with Sennacherib is backed up by solid archeological and historical data. However, other than the Bible and other religiously inspired sources, there is no historical evidence that either Abraham or Moses existed. That does not negate their existence. Proving that a single individual existed 5000+ years ago is tough unless they were an Egyptian nobel. But, proving they existed AND what they exactly believed is a toughy regardless.
The scientific evidence bakcs up what I said. It is irrelevant in the religious context. It still doesn't change the fact that God's name is Jehovah.
Remember the time Janet Reno started break dancing in Florida during a speech ?
I’d buy a round for the house. In addition to the tip . Cash .
“(And don’t forget it was a REPUBLICAN administration that wrote off over 2000 MIAs so that di*kheaded secretary of state whose name I don’t even want to recall (Henry the K) could get his Nobel Peace Prize”
I recall reading about that, and have seen the posts on this site from people who would never vote for him because of that. I do not believe his position is defensible.
They are all evil. I have been voting for the lesser of evils since i first came of voting age. No exception this time around, either.
“You go Cinnamon Girl!
Translation: I’m with you.”
Thank goodness you cleared that one up.
ATTN PURISTS:
Yeah go ahead and sit out and elect a MARXIST RACIST based on your arrogant self centered beliefs. Life is not PERFECT so please get over it. MCCAIN is not John Birch but he is 1000% better then the Racist Muslim or the Socialist Queen. Get over it and BTW , SHUT UP please !
That would make an excellent tagline!!!
“better then Hillary or Obama.... seeing the way they are fighting right now”
So if they weren’t fighting, you’d vote for one of them instead of mclame?
Then I would suggest you put down your crackpipe. Crack is wack! Funny how you say "VERY" large amounts. Any amount of crack is bad. Is that how you excuse your habit?
But I will vote for a Pro-Amnesty, Pro-Terrorist, Pro-Global Warming Hysteria, Pro-Tax, Pro Roe v. Wade, America blaming RINO, as soon as I can get John McCain's knife out of my back.
Thank you very much for restoring my post!
I do think I’m going to repost the whole list on my blog. But I will keep reposting their names here to make my points.
I like your homepage, I like your tag line, and I like you.
Your screen name is aptly chosen. Just for the record, I have not made my choice for any self-serving reasons. I make them because I want our country to remain a sovereign nation, not the puppet of foreign international groups such as the EU and the UN. I want our borders secured, as any sovereign nation would do. I want our Constitution upheld, including both the 1st and the 2nd Amendment. NONE of the three candidates now in the running will do that.
I see from your comment (”Get over it and BTW , SHUT UP please !”) that, like the candidate you support, you have no respect or understanding of the 1st Amendment. Unless you are Jim Robinson, you have no standing to tell ANYONE to “SHUT UP” even if you did add “please.”
>>>that di*kheaded secretary of state whose name I don’t even want to recall (Henry the K) could get his Nobel Peace Prize.
Never forget!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/797596/posts
Henry Kissinger: This Man Is On The Other Side
Excerpt:
...his successful plan intentionally to abandon South Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia to Communist takeover.
(snip)
In negotiating the sellout of South Vietnam, Dr. Kissinger explained that “Hanoi cannot be asked to leave” the Vietcong “to the mercy of Saigon.” So he arranged to leave Saigon to the merciless Vietcong, forcing our allies to accept hundreds of thousands of North Vietnamese troops in their territory. Former White House speechwriter William Safire has described Kissinger’s comments while attempting to surrender Saigon. “The big question is,’ Henry said, ‘does the other side want to settle for anything less than total victory? Their demands are absurd: they want us to withdraw and on the way out to overthrow the Saigon Government.’ He brooded about that a minute. ‘If we ever decide to withdraw, it’ll be up to them to overthrow the Saigon Government — not us.’” (Before The Fall, New York, Doubleday, 1975.)
Eventually, of course, South Vietnam was told there could be a quick surrender or a slow surrender. The South Vietnamese attempted to delay their destruction as long as possible. Marvin and Bernard Kalb have related how Kissinger’s aide Alexander Haig (C.F.R.) “arrived in Saigon with a presidential ultimatum: if Thieu persisted in holding out against an agreement, the United States would sign a separate peace with North Vietnam, and all military and economic aid to South Vietnam would be cut off.” (Kissinger, Boston, Little, Brown, 1974.) So President Thieu took Kissinger’s word that Peking and Moscow would curtail their supplies to Hanoi. What followed was Dr. Kissinger’s “decent interval,” with the result that Saigon has been renamed Ho chi Minh City.
(snip)
Henry Kissinger is supported in managing all of this by an able staff of conspirators who, like him, have ties to both the Communists and the Establishment Insiders. Kissinger brazenly admits approving a number of security risks over the objections of worried officials. The security dossiers of U.S. Ambassadors he sent to anti-Communist Chile and the Republic of China, for instance, contain reports linking both men to the underground Communist apparatus. Our Ambassador to Portugal boasts to the Comrades with whom he is working that America is not a capitalist nation, but well on the way to being a Socialist Welfare State, a development he finds to his liking. Boris Klosson, Kissinger’s top man at the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT), has not only been identified as a K.G.B. contact but arranged the return of Marxist Lee Harvey Oswald from Moscow despite his known K.G.B. connections- The subsequent assassination of President John Kennedy was coordinated, according to an important defector in Britain, Oleg Adolfovich Lyalin, by the K.G.B.***
Much more at link.
God Bless him.
“I told them when we’d go up to the Pentagon, whether he walks off a plane or is carried off, you’re not going to leave him in Iraq like you did those guys in Vietnam,” Keith Maupin said.
Thank you!
Thank you. I was restored :)
Fair is fair.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.