Posted on 04/01/2008 7:16:36 PM PDT by HAL9000
Lumumba died Jan. 17, 1961, three days before JFK became President. This is the first I heard anyone suggest the Kennedys were to blame for his death.
Hilliary ping
Mary Jane Kopeckne concurs.
Maybe so. But the Democrat Party was easily corrupted--welcomed the corruption--in fact corrupted itself far more than any two individuals could possibly corrupt it--to the eternal disgust and scorn of decent people everywhere and for all time!
For Democrats to object to the Clintons now--when it is to their advantage to do so--is even more disgusting. Democrat politicians, their supporters, and their operatives could not be lower or more disgusting in the opinions of honest, decent people.
No. The Clintons were attracted to the DemocRat party because they felt at home there. They didn't corrupt the party any more than a cow pie corrupts the fly that lays its eggs in it.
There is a lot that doesn’t pass a smell test. I find it hard to believe that much attention was paid to an inexperienced lawyer who may have just passed the bar exam after already flunking the bar exam. I do agree she is swine and was swine in the 70’s but I find it hared to believe she was/is somewhat competent.
It's NOT a game - no respectable American should vote for Hillary.
I always disliked her outfits she wore ! I nver seen her in simple blue jeans !
I worry that she is finally getting hers because the Dummicrats have finally found somebody even worse than the Clintons and even more danderous to the nation as we know it.
Boy, that face...what a little snot she must have been then!
How could a 27-year old woman, fresh out of Yale, command so much power on this committee? Amazing, especially in a much more male-dominated era.
She is rotten, isn’t she. I think she’s more dangerous than Bill, who’s basically an opportunist.
My theory is that she’s so rotten because, paradoxically, she’s a moral zealot. She’s so thoroughly convinced of her own righteousness and so throughly convinced of her opponents’ evilness that she can justify any kind of rotten behavior on her own part. As she sees it, her cause is so just that it would be evil to let traditional notions of morality stand in her way.
I think this is a common problem on the left — mischanneled and overflowing moral passion that becomes destructive.
By the way, isn’t it interesting how she conspired against Nixon, breaking the rules as she went? And isn’t it interesting how she accuses the right of conspiring against her? A clear case of projection.
I've always assumed she was mad at daddy for some reason. I don't have much to go on for this, other than I was a late-teen/early twenty-something at the time, and a lot of young women back then seemed to have very negative feelings toward their fathers.
Hillary seems to have a lot of hate roiling her insides. It came from somewhere.
If she could have killed Nixon with her own hands and gotten away with it, I believe she would have.
<><
Zeifman had threatened to resign had this been executed; he said as much in a column he wrote some years ago.
Bruno Pantsuit's arrogance was greater than that of Ehrlichmann and Haldeman per Zeifman in Barbara Olson, Hell to Pay: The unfolding story of Hillary Rodham Clinton, Regnery, 1999, page 123.
Democrats look at impeachment as a resume enhancer: Alcee Hastings now a Florida Democrat congressman having been an impeached judge.
Bill Clinton being spared any downside, except of course that of having to appear to be married to Frau Mao.
In the perspective from this side of Filegate, Nixon's after-the-fact knowledge of the theft of a single file pales in comparison to his persecutor Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton Ceacescu-Peron's breathtaking illegal extraction of one thousand FBI files.
Coulter points out Nixon never audited anybody; that Clinton audited a considerable number of citizens who dared cross him (or her), a fact which I could not make the twenty-year morning host of WHO Des Moines accept, he the supercilious personal destroyer of Romney.[Ann Coulter, High Crimes & Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton, Regnery, 1998.]
Arrogant, ruthless exercise of power with the ability to fake crying at a moment's notice is the Clinton trademark.
When I was little, we had simple toys; one was a “top” around which we wound a piece of string then pulled and the top would spin. Sort of like this article tries to do.
Hillary is evil and these attempts to humanize her are not going to cut it.
I never realized that HR had actually been fired from her job as a Whitewater committee staff investigator. I had only been aware that Zeifman was dissatisfied with her performance and refused to recommend her for other jobs.
Education without morality will produce an educated menace. Hiliary Clinton is an educated menace.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.