Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kiriath_jearim

For the good of the country, it was the best move the government could make. The chain reaction that would have occured would have ruined a whole lot of people. There is concern that this whole thing started in Europe and could have been a terrorists attack. Actually, our financial system is a lot more fragile that people believe. That’s why BinLaden said he will attack out financial system and ruin us.


2 posted on 04/03/2008 1:53:09 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RC2

The panic and the chain reaction that would have ensued if this bank failed would have been paramount to 1929 again.


4 posted on 04/03/2008 1:54:33 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RC2

Yes. And the government may well end up making money on this “bailout.”

The only bailout that is being considered is the insane plan by The Beast and other Democrats to prohibit foreclosures for five years. That would directly interfere with private financial contracts, and is EXACTLY why undeveloped countries failed to attract capital in the past. Who would invest in a country if a change in government occured and a whacko like Castro (or the Beast) took office and the government seized private assets?

The Beast is evil, but she is a lawyer and is not stupid. She knows damned well that her proposal would never pass Constitution muster, due to contract protections.

Perhaps a lawyer here can explain it better than I.


5 posted on 04/03/2008 1:57:22 PM PDT by dashing doofus (Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RC2
Some people are starting to catch on that the conspiracy is not a theory...

Crisis are like bowling pins set up for a strike.

10 posted on 04/03/2008 2:14:26 PM PDT by kcm.org (Now unto Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RC2

So piling up lie after lie on the basis of taxpayer dollars is a good thing ?

No, those who live beyond their means, including banks who over leverage themselves, need to pay the cost of their stupidity.

Dodd, that idiot, got one thing right - we’re privatizing the rewards and socializing the losses.

Bad, bad policy.


17 posted on 04/03/2008 2:46:17 PM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RC2
“For the good of the country, it was the best move the government could make. The chain reaction that would have occurred would have ruined a whole lot of people.”

This seems pretty basic to me. Our government is supposed to protect our financial infrastructure and prevent financial collapses and panics; that's one of the few things that our government actually should do.

People are getting their undies in a bunch that someone is “getting bailed out”. No not really. Bear Sterns stock holders were decimated, their stock holdings were wiped out.
This move was about preserving our financial system and preventing a catastrophic meltdown. That benefits everyone.

32 posted on 04/03/2008 3:37:54 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland ("We have to drain the swamp" George Bush, September 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson