To: Timeout
Hmmm. This would explain his affinity for Farrakhan. It also squares with the fact that whatever Wright is preaching, it's not Christianity. Add another possible former Muslim to the picture and things get very interesting indeed.
Wright's "church" could be taqiyaa (Nation of Islam flavor) on a commercial scale (and typical white people would never suspect a thing).
8 posted on
04/07/2008 2:41:44 PM PDT by
Charles Martel
(The Tree of Liberty thirsts.)
To: Charles Martel
I agree with your comments.
Wouldn’t both of these high-profile people be considered dangerous apostates? Yes, I believe they would.
Makes me say hmmmm, too.
47 posted on
04/08/2008 7:17:01 AM PDT by
milford421
(U.N. OUT OF U.S.)
To: Charles Martel
Hmmm. This would explain his affinity for Farrakhan. It also squares with the fact that whatever Wright is preaching, it's not Christianity. Add another possible former Muslim to the picture and things get very interesting indeed. Wright's "church" could be taqiyaa (Nation of Islam flavor) on a commercial scale (and typical white people would never suspect a thing). Farrakhan's NoI is not really "Islam" in the Quranic sense. They do not preach from the Quran or Hadith. Nation of Islam is this weird Black Nationalist cult that just calls itself Islamic. Similarly, Wright's group seems mainly Black Nationalist at its core. What we might have here are just two "skins" on the same core.
it could also be that Wright is not as "former" as he claims, and that Wright's church is a "feeder" to NoI, and/or a place where NoI can congregate while giving the surface appearance of being mainstream Christian
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson