Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kc8ukw

The libs in Missouri very smartly decided that Voter Photo ID was unconstitutional under the MISSOURI Constitution. Unless Congress mandates photo ID (never happen, even assuming it would be desirable) or the Missouri Court makeup changes, this decision will have little effect on them.

It has been a long time since I read that MO decision, so I don’t recall if the law could be re-crafted for a “less burdensome” law and get a different result. IIRC, though, the Rats now have that governorship anyway, so it wouldn’t likely get passed.

This is a great decision, though, and should clear the way for the Arizona law and similar ones that could follow. Significantly, the Arizona law requires proof of CITIZENSHIP, not just residency and identity.

Doesn’t California have a ballot initiative underway for Voter ID?


112 posted on 04/28/2008 10:16:20 AM PDT by Bluegrass Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Bluegrass Federalist

Missouri still has a Republican governor. And I think I’ll email my state representative anyway, (who is a very reasonable, thoughtful Democrat), and make sure she knows what happened federally. If there was ever cause to amend the Missouri constitution, here it is. Thanks for the info.


136 posted on 04/28/2008 11:34:31 AM PDT by kc8ukw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson