Posted on 04/29/2008 12:48:40 PM PDT by GoldwaterInstitute
‘Tax Cuts for the Rich’ Dangerous Rhetoric
Thomas C. Patterson, Goldwater Institute Daily Email, April 29, 2008
The presidential candidates are promising some pretty pricey stuff. But you and I aren't going to have to pay for it. No, the free health care, free college, subsidized mortgages, and other goodies can be paid for by repealing President Bush's “tax cuts for the rich.”
But here's the problem. There were no Bush tax cuts for the rich. The rates were cut, but the rich pay more taxes than ever. The top 1 percent of earners now pay 36.9 percent of all income taxes (up from 25.8 percent in 1986), while the bottom 50 percent pay 3.3 percent of the taxes and almost half pay nothing at all.
But it's true the rich are getting richer. The poor have become richer, too, over the past 30 years, but not at the same rate. So there is a growing income gap. Changes in the tax code can't possibly explain the disparity. In fact, changes in taxation have mitigated the growing gap in wealth.
The problem isn't taxes, but education. Some areas have high school dropout rates up to 50 percent. Throw in high numbers of under-educated immigrants, and an income gap is all but assured.
The candidates may think they get a lot of political mileage by bashing Bush and his wealthy friends. But "hope" and "change" based on economic myths and promises that can't be paid for don't cut it. Eventually, reality intrudes.
Tom Patterson is chairman of the Goldwater Institute, a former state legislator and emergency room physician. A longer version of this article originally appeared in the East Valley Tribune.
“But here’s the problem. There were no Bush tax cuts for the rich. The rates were cut, but the rich pay more taxes than ever. The top 1 percent of earners now pay 36.9 percent of all income taxes (up from 25.8 percent in 1986), while the bottom 50 percent pay 3.3 percent of the taxes and almost half pay nothing at all.”
Doesn’t matter...the Dems have told the lie enough times to their sheep they believe it themselves.
True dat!
susie
ping
The rich are getting richer because the typical high income family has two responsible, educated working adults.
By contrast the typical “poor” family is headed by a single mother without much education or common sense. Nonetheless, the “poor” family is more likely to be overweight than the rich family, and by world standards is obscenely well off.
Here’s another lie, by omission at least.
They always say something about “paying for” tax cuts. That doesn’t even make sense. You don’t “pay for” letting people keep their own money.
However, notice they NEVER talk about how much their programs are going to cost and the impossibility that “repealing tax cuts” could ever pay for them.
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.