I'm not saying that you're wrong that you consider it evidence. I can go a supermarket, hand them a five dollar bill, and say, "Well, I consider this to be a hudnred! Don't tell me I'm wrong, you arrogant jerk!", but, to say the least, it probably won't net me $100 worth of groceries.
You can consider and one and one to add up to fifty. You can consider whatever you feel like. But whether you consider something as such and whether objective reality agrees with you are two different matters.
And as such, I see no objective reality that says that your "evidence" is anything more than flimsy, and self-chosen to match your desired ends. I showed you alternate explanations for both items. I showed you that the rest of Paul's life is consistent with those explanations. And I gave you the opportunity to prove otherwise, to show me, for example, his long racist voting history. And those requests have been repeatedly ignored.
Only an arrogant jerk thinks they have the right to control the thoughts of others
You're really flying off the deep end if you think I'm trying to control your thoughts. You can conjure up whatever fantasies you desire. Have yourself a blast. I'm just going to make it clear to everyone reading this that that is exactly what you're doing.
And what is the 'objective reality' that proves your 'evidence' is any better?