Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: forkinsocket
Forgive me, but there is something so artlessly contrived about this writing. Dare I say it, it is so homosexual in the style and the purview of the piece.

I can just imagine the assignment desk editor at The Spectator saying, "McKinstry ! Write something on this genealogy business. My brother-in-law is obsessed by it and I can't stand the bloody blogger. You know what to do, put genealogy down and make the people look stupid. I don't need it good, I need it Tuesday."

So dutifully McKinstry sets out to write as he is told. It reminds me of Rex Reed some years ago determined to make a name for himself as a movie critic being flamboyantly obnoxious and cutting about the people he was reviewing, much like the English chap on American Idol whose name I am proud to say I do not know.

If you are a young fashion designer determined to make a reputation and set your new career on an upward course, you might contrive a more flamboyant fashion trend. Or, you might try to make a name for yourself by wittily burlesquing the garments of celebrities for television viewers. You might even publish a worst dressed list.

It's cynical and it cheapens us all.


49 posted on 05/08/2008 3:54:28 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford

He’s not gay, he’s a British journalist. Easy mistake.

Besides, you probably only care about genealogy for the same reason I do.


105 posted on 05/08/2008 7:03:36 PM PDT by YCTHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson