 |
|
LeGrande Advocatuer de les Cultistes
Supporting Cultists since Apr 1, 2001
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
Libertarian who thinks what we need is more shaggin teenage girls in the name of a fake prophet!
You started the Hitler comparison, I just finished it.
You have repeatedly stated that LEO's should arrest people before they commit a crime, and you have excoriated me for saying that you are wrong. You clearly advocate unconstitutional measures that are identical to those used by the Nazi's.
So, there ya go again. Imply I’m Hitler, then provide absolutely zero proof of your allegation that I vilify the FLDS, much less want them exterminated or even deprived of Constitutional rights. They should however be held to account for the laws they have broken and the harm they are causing.
You have the audacity to claim that you don't vilify the FLDS? Hmm, that is so over the top that maybe I need to check and see if all of your posts haven't been deleted.
Your posts become more bizarre with each utterance.
That just cuts me to the quick. LOL
|
|
LeGrande Advocatuer de les Cultistes
Supporting Cultists since Apr 1, 2001
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
FC:Yikes, yikes, yikes. So now I am Hitler as well. Who has advocated denying the FLDS ANY Constitutional rights?
LeGrande: You started the Hitler comparison, I just finished it.
As you admitted in an earlier post, you are very good at spinning, in fact that’s all you do. Here is what was actually said by me:
[LeGrande is making an extremely tenuous legalistic argument that Joe Smith was a serial adulterer, just not a polygamist. Given that Smith gave sermons and was the rootsource of the polygamy doctrine as well as a philanderer, this would be similar in form to arguing Hitler was not a mas murderer because no one ever saw him gassing a Jew.]
So, someone with a 6th grade education would understand the FORM COMPARISON Smith Was Not a Polygamist though he Authored Polygamy IS SIMILAR TO SAYING Hitler Was Not A Mas Murderer though he Authored The Mass Extermination. A was not B as C was not D - nothing to do with Hitler.
So, my statement really has little to do with Hitler and is directed towards the spin in your thought patterns. Of course, ye of little insight naturally escalated it to calling me equivalent to Hitler. Of course this again shows you to be 1) emotion driven, 2) vindictive and 3) lacking in basic skills of logical analysis.
[You have repeatedly stated that LEO’s should arrest people before they commit a crime,]
Only a person with zero moral fiber (perhaps an atheist) would ignore a pending crime that was about to do harm to another human being. Normal people, and the police, act first and take the consequences if they are mistaken. I have yet to see a policeman sued for stopping and cuffing an angry male walking down the street with a baseball bat.
“and you have excoriated me for saying that you are wrong. You clearly advocate unconstitutional measures that are identical to those used by the Nazi’s.”
The Rule of Thumb of debate is when one compare the other person to Hitler, they lose. Now we all know your response (but FastCoyote mentioned Hitler! !), but we all well know that you were not being compared to Hitler except as a device to demonstrate a logical form you used. I could have used Stalin, I could have used any of a number of other examples. Not you LeGrande, you call me Hitlerian because you have no rational responses beyond inuendo and smearing.
[You have the audacity to claim that you don’t vilify the FLDS? Hmm, that is so over the top that maybe I need to check and see if all of your posts haven’t been deleted. ]
Yes, I requested an example of me “vilifying” the FLDS and you provided doodly squat, bupkiss, nada because you are all hot air. Your point was that I villify the FLDS so I can impose a Hitlerian solution. Yet no proof.
Such baseless innuendo makes you nothing but a slanderous thug. Keep it up, each cycle shows your true colors more and more clearly.