Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Naked photos, e-mail get teens in trouble
CNN/AP ^ | 06/04/2008

Posted on 06/04/2008 7:31:38 PM PDT by abt87

HARTFORD, Connecticut (AP) -- Passing notes in study hall or getting your best friend to ask a boy if he likes you or, you know, LIKES you, is so last century. Nowadays, teenagers are snapping naked pictures of themselves on their cell phones and sending them to their boyfriends and girlfriends.

Many of these pictures are falling into the wrong hands -- or worse, everyone's hands, via the Internet -- and leading to criminal charges.

School administrators in Santa Fe, Texas, confiscated dozens of cell phones from students in May after nude photos of two junior high girls began circulating. The girls had sent the photos to their boyfriends, who forwarded them to others, officials said.

Some boys are photographing themselves, too. In Utah, a 16-year-old boy was charged with a felony for sending nude photos of himself over a cell phone to several girls. Four middle school students -- two boys and two girls -- in Daphne, Alabama, took photos of themselves on their cell phones and traded the images back and forth, authorities said.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Blood of Tyrants

You need to relax, did you have a life as a kid?


21 posted on 06/04/2008 7:51:00 PM PDT by east1234 (It's the borders stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: abt87
He apparently didn't think there was anything wrong with it. He didn't know it was illegal."

If you believe that, I have this really cool bridge which is available.
I find it impossible that anyone 17 years old could not be aware that this is not only illegal, but is big time trouble that lasts forever.

22 posted on 06/04/2008 7:53:21 PM PDT by Publius6961 (You're Government, it's not your money, and you never have to show a profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: east1234

Amen. The pedos aside, the ubiquity of cameras is just making activity easier that teens had the intent to do before. Middle schoolers generally don’t know about age of consent or child pornography laws, and if they’re taking pictures of each other, I fail to see why they should be treated like pedos when they’re in the same age group.


23 posted on 06/04/2008 7:54:16 PM PDT by abt87 (Liberals aren't stupid...they can still beat Koko the monkey in chess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: abt87
I think they should face lots of jail time when they post photos of others on the Internet, email them to their friends and acquaintances, OR TRY TO SELL THEM-—no matter how old they aren't.

When kids distribute pictures, whether of themselves or others, it is still dissemination of pornography.

24 posted on 06/04/2008 8:01:40 PM PDT by singfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
That is the law. If you are under 18, and photograph yourself in the nude, you are in possession of an illegal picture. In Arizona, you get 20 years in jail for each such picture found.

Your statement is incorrect. A 14 year old will not be put in prison for 20 years for such a crime.

25 posted on 06/04/2008 8:03:48 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: abt87
Just wondering, are there still any cell phones without built-in cameras?

LOL!

In December of 2007 we finally replaced our 7-year-old phones, and being cranky and old fashioned, I just wanted a damn phone.

Didn't happen.
I got the simplest free phone available, and I now have a camera whether I like it or not...

26 posted on 06/04/2008 8:04:14 PM PDT by Publius6961 (You're Government, it's not your money, and you never have to show a profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: abt87

Jeez, somebody needs to protect them from themselves. Their parents certainly aren’t.


27 posted on 06/04/2008 8:06:46 PM PDT by singfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: singfreedom

And how’s that different then, say, a 35 year old producing porn featuring a 20-something? Child pornography laws are meant to reflect the age of consent in pornography.

If they got those picture in a sneaky way (ie. going into girls’ bathrooms and stalking them) then they should face the same punishments that adults would for doing such acts to fellow adults, not because of the age of the person. If we try a minor with laws that are meant to enforce age group boundaries between minors/adults, then we are pushing the laws beyond their original intent, and beyond our cultural normalities as people within age groups.

To charge a minor as if he/she is an adult on “To Catch a Predator” is like arresting teens both under the age of consent just for having sex.


28 posted on 06/04/2008 8:07:38 PM PDT by abt87 (Liberals aren't stupid...they can still beat Koko the monkey in chess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
I got the simplest free phone available, and I now have a camera whether I like it or not.

And there is where you went wrong. Cameras on phones represent a revenue stream for the cell phone company. Each "media message" that you send (notice there is no other way to get a picture off the phone), means that the phone company gets 25-cents.

If you want a phone without a camera, music player, video player, etc. you have to pay $$$ because you are depriving the phone company of their revenue stream.

29 posted on 06/04/2008 8:19:39 PM PDT by dan1123 (If you want to find a person's true religion, ask them what makes them a "good person".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: abt87

For a girlfriend and boyfriend to exchange photos is one thing. When a former boyfriend (or girlfriend), in a fit of petty pique, posts explicit photos of his/her underage “friend” on the Internet, yes, I think there should be a severe penalty. In this instance they are not just harming themselves, but exposing the other party to danger from REAL pedophiles.


30 posted on 06/04/2008 8:27:52 PM PDT by singfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: singfreedom

Maybe, but I would not support forcing them to register as a sex offender. Probation and community service would be a better solution in that case.


31 posted on 06/04/2008 8:29:52 PM PDT by abt87 (Liberals aren't stupid...they can still beat Koko the monkey in chess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

The cell phone has become a modern baby sitting extension cord. Parents used to physically keep tabs on their kids and that’s been replaced with a phone call. Instead of “I’ll be here at 4:00pm to pick you up” it’s now “call me when you’re finished”.


32 posted on 06/04/2008 8:37:48 PM PDT by Rebelbase (McCain: The Third Bush Term ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Not to mention the fact that they are so cheap that it no longer no matters for a lot of parents, of how often they break or lose them.


33 posted on 06/04/2008 8:39:04 PM PDT by abt87 (Liberals aren't stupid...they can still beat Koko the monkey in chess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dan1123

“If you want a phone without a camera, music player, video player, etc. you have to pay $$$ because you are depriving the phone company of their revenue stream. “

A little black paint on the lens and problem solved.


34 posted on 06/04/2008 8:43:04 PM PDT by Rebelbase (McCain: The Third Bush Term ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dan1123

“Cameras on phones represent a revenue stream for the cell phone company”

Both our phones have cameras and in the over 2 years that we hqave had them we’ve never taken a picture with the phone.

We even have text messaging blocked on our phones since we won’t wastze the time to use it and don’t know anyone that does.


35 posted on 06/04/2008 8:46:37 PM PDT by dalereed (both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: abt87
"Middle schoolers generally don’t know about age of consent or child pornography laws,..."

Then the public schools should teach them those things -- instead of how to put a condom on a cucumber...

36 posted on 06/04/2008 9:05:29 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: abt87

Modesty is a wonderful virtue.


37 posted on 06/04/2008 9:40:36 PM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
"Middle schoolers generally don’t know about age of consent or child pornography laws,..."

Actually, that's a parent's function to teach them what's illegal and such. I had no problem with graphically showing my 14 year old daughter how simple it is for her picture or *any* picture to end up in public on the internet. A girl she knows at school did this with a cell phone (she's 18) and ended up on the internet. I showed my daughter the picture in all its glory. She understood the chain of events that led to it, and that taught her more than anything I could have said.

I also pointed out to her that any nude/pornographic pictures of anyone under 18 gets people shipped off to prison no matter how innocent taking the picture seemed, and she got that point, too. Sadly, there's a lot of teenagers out there who woouldn't have understood such a message. I'd like to think that my child understood it at least in part because of what her mother and I have taught her.

Also, if a teenager is taught more about sex than "Don't", as a lot of parents like to teach, he or she will have a better understand of the several things you shouldn't do lightly, *and why*. I think some of the worst excesses of teen sexuality these days are because the only sexual education a lot of kids get is from TV and internet, and that's because their parents prefer to bury their heads in the sand, and only teach them that you shouldn't do it, but never teach them enough for them to understand why not.

38 posted on 06/04/2008 9:55:14 PM PDT by mavfin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: abt87

Ah, the wonders of technology. It seems whenever a new technology comes out that the inventors promise will lead to a bright future, it’s most popular consequence is usually something a lot more degrading or appalling.


39 posted on 06/05/2008 1:08:34 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: east1234; abt87

Yes, I did have a life as a kid and it DID NOT include trading pictures of my naked body.

What? Should we just hug them and tell them everything will be okay and make them promise not to do it again?

What they did was a serious FELONY! I didn’t propose sending them to jail like an adult, but the seriousness of the crime must be imposed on them.


40 posted on 06/05/2008 5:14:23 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson