Posted on 06/17/2008 6:00:53 PM PDT by freespirited
So, yes, not just the nomenclature used for "race", but also the very question itself changed, and in dramatic ways.
The colorblind society was safely tucked out of the way so that the racebaiting welfare pimps could make a living.
1. I know it is an open discussion board.
2. I know about pinging courtesy.
3. I know you are allowed to comment on any thread.
I just don’t know why you have chosen to continually respond to me about nothing on this thread.
As I said, I don’t care that you think this is settled and I thought the issue raised by the thread starter raised some interesting questions. I furhter said, I might care had you said the particular issue I raised was settled and provided me a link where you thought it was settled. You didn’t, so I don’t understand why you keep respond to or even more about me?
Well I am not so conerned with what the document is called or if it is the orginal issued in 1961 or if it is a follow document issued later or a copy of the original. I just don’t understand why the campaign would think it would benefit not to release what ever document Obama used to get his passport.
My birth certificate, like the author’s, was issued in New York County (Manhattan). Mine, however, was issued in 1950. It was filled in by hand and signed by the attending physician. My copy is a microfiche negative, with a raised seal.
GREAT DETECTIVE WORK!!
Does your friend's cert have the certificate number blacked out? Does it have an embossed seal (Obama's doesn't -- the issuing department in HI says all certs it sends out have one).
Also a Patricia DeCosta has posted her cerfication from HI online. Hers says "Date Accepted by Registrar" while Obama's says "Date Filed by Registrar."
I think the jury is still out as to what is going on.
ONE bit of evidence that the Birth “Certificate” is a fake is that it lists the father’s race as AFRICAN! In the early 1960’s no jurisdiction would make a mistake THAT egregious. African is a geographic location, not a race, which should have been Negroid. The mother’s race, Caucasian, is correct, however. Could this document have been forged by an Osama Obama supporter?
The states should require proof of being a "natural born citizen" in order to file for and be placed on a primary election ballot or general election ballot for electors for President of the United States. Anyone not meeting the requirements of office such as being at least 35 years old, a "natural born citizen", or legally barred from holding the office of President under the 22 amendment should be barred from appearing as a candidate in all states for any primary for President or general election where electors are chosen for the office of President of the United States.
The states should require proof of being a "natural born citizen" in order to file for and be placed on a primary election ballot or general election ballot for electors for President of the United States. Anyone not meeting the requirements of office such as being at least 35 years old, a "natural born citizen", or legally barred from holding the office of President under the 22 amendment should be barred from appearing as a candidate in all states for any primary for President or general election where electors are chosen for the office of President of the United States.
Not only should the states ban anyone constitutionally banned from being president from being on a candidate in a presidential primary or election of electors from appearing on any ballot, but the states should be made to disclose their documentation of each candidate. Individuals or organizations should be able to sue the various state governments to produce the documents proving that a candidate meets the qualifications for the office of President under the Freedom of Information Act.
Since the chusing of electors is under the direct, unchecked, control of State Legislatures, perhaps you should take it up with them.
I think all Federal legislation regulating the acts of the People with regard to elections (except as provided for in Article I, section 4) is unconstitutional - please let's not make the problem worse.
I think all Federal legislation regulating the acts of the People with regard to elections (except as provided for in Article I, section 4) is unconstitutional - please let's not make the problem worse.
That's what I was implying. The action does not need to be taken up by the federal government at all. I think an FOI inquiry should be made for every single state where Obama filed.
bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
