Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
The earlier thread addressed each and every issue being raised in this thread and rational answers were provided for each and every issue.

A couple of issues have been addressed. There are still several which haven't. I am not satisfied that jpeg compression would eliminate the background. This document should have an embossed seal stamped on it, with a stamped signature, perhaps that is on the back. But the stamped seal should have been noticeable even in the scan. Really, a scanned image is too easy to manipulate. I could show a scanned image of me on mars. Unless some unbiased source examined the actual document, this does not prove a thing. All this image does is raise questions which could easily been answered if the document was made available.

250 posted on 06/18/2008 11:26:30 AM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]


To: Always Right
There happens to be a "date stamp" on the back. Another poster played with one of the two different internet images and was able to bring it up. That's on the earlier thread.

This is not a Dan Rather moment. There we didn't have the originals ~ in fact, the guy who created them said he'd destroyed them after he made copies.

What we did have was incontrovertible time dilation effect info ~ namely, "kerning had been left on" when the guy prepared the "original" forgeries! (bwahahahahahaha!!!!).

Here we can go to the original fabricator, the State of Hawaii, and see what their doggone transcript certification looks like. Anyone can do that. Folks rarely forge such easily verified materials except as a joke.

253 posted on 06/18/2008 11:37:27 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson